IMPORTANT BLOG ANNOUNCEMENT

PLEASE CHANGE YOUR BOOKMARKS AND FEEDS TO THE NEW URL, YANKEEANALYSTS.COM. TYU IS IN NO WAY AFFILIATED WITH THE NEW YORK YANKEES OR YANKEES UNIVERSE.
Feb 142011

Decision, decisions..

Yankee GM Brian Cashman had some choice words for Joba Chamberlain as pitchers and catchers reported to camp. The NY Post has the details:

“Anybody who has [minor league] options is not a lock for anything,” Cashman said when asked by The Post if the 25-year-old was a roster-spot lock. “Any player with options has to re-earn everything. You earn more or you earn less — New York or Scranton [Triple-A]. I fully expect Joba to be in our bullpen. If not, he would have worked his way out of it.

(snip)

Now, Chamberlain, who has three minor league options left, will be fighting for a spot in the pen.

“We won’t decide, he will decide his role,” Cashman said. “Players always dictate [by their performances].”

That is certainly true of all of their young pitchers, but you don’t hear Brian saying these things about Dave Robertson or Ivan Nova. Reports that he showed up in camp this year heavier than last may have been the impetus for these comments, but the Yankee brass has long made a habit of trying to light a fire under Joba for the entire time he’s been with the club. Draft watchers will recall Joba was 300 pounds as a teen in his first year of college, so from day 1 he’s a player who’s been tagged as needing guidance and motivation. When your 46 year old manager is in better shape than a 25 year old player, on a team like the Yankees with their expectations, one can understand why this issue is raised. Whether it’s Chris Britton, Jon Albaladejo or Joba Chamberlain, bad-bodied pitchers seem to always have their glass half empty under this regime.

But how realistic are these threats? Given the fact that Joba’s role has been subjugated to low leverage middle relief, I would take them very seriously. He’s as expendable as it gets on a MLB pitching staff. Which leads us to the next possibility, which is trading him. Again, from the NY Post:

Then there is the possibility the Yankees could trade Chamberlain, who agreed to a one-year, $1.4 million contract to avoid going to arbitration this past offseason. It was the first time he was eligible.

“He still has value,” an AL talent evaluator said. “Teams would want him if he is available. It will be interesting to see how the Yankees pitch him in spring-training games and who from other teams is there only to see him.”

He certainly has value, but more as a buy-low candidate or added piece of a deal rather than the centerpiece he would have been in 07-08. The Twins could certainly use some relievers…..

Feb 032011

Yesterday, I projected the potential starting rotation by WAR so I’ll do the same thing with the bullpen today. However, it’s near impossible to tell just how many guys will be pitching in the bullpen and at what times. In fact, it’s possible that some of the guys I projected in the rotation will get significant innings in the bullpen rather than in the rotation. To avoid guess work, I’ll just be calculating the WAR of guys we KNOW will be in the bullpen and comparing their personal marks to those of last year. The guys we KNOW will be in the bullpen:

Mariano Rivera
Rafael Soriano
David Robertson
Joba Chamberlain
Pedro Feliciano
Boone Logan

I’m leaving out the long man because I have no idea who that’s going to be. I put the pitchers in that order because that’s how I think they’ll be used in terms of leverage, and that’s how the spreadsheet is formatted. To clarify, we’re assuming Mariano Rivera is going to be used in the highest leverage situations while Boone Logan will be used in the lowest leverage situations. Obviously, this is flexible and not exact, but we’ll roll with it for now. On to the projections!

Mariano Rivera: 2.99 FIP in 68 IP, 2.7 WAR
Rafael Soriano: 3.48 FIP in 66 IP, 1.3 WAR
David Robertson: 3.68 FIP in 67 IP, 0.8 WAR
Joba Chamberlain: 2.98 FIP in 72 IP, 1.4WAR*
Pedro Feliciano: 3.89 FIP in 65 IP, 0.5 WAR
Boone Logan: 4.24 FIP in 48 IP, 0.2 WAR

*Joba’s CAIRO projection included nine starts, which affected his originally projected IP (85) and FIP (3.94). So, I used his 2010 season as a guide and rounded up to 72 innings, while keeping his FIP tally the same. Joba showed in 2010 that he was pretty good at the FIP skill set and his career as a reliever (2.55 FIP) mirrors that.

So how do the 2011 projections compare the 2010 results? We see Joba staying the same at 1.4 WAR while we see Mo gaining an entire win from his 2010 season. D-Rob gains a tenth of a win; Logan loses two tenths of a win. Soriano drops three tenths of a win, and that’s probably due to the FIP correction CAIRO sees for Rafael. As for Feliciano, he’d also be dropping three tenths of a win but I may be underestimating his leverage.

In terms of confidence, I feel a good deal of it int he FIP projections (though Soriano’s may be a touch high) but not necessarily so in terms of the exact leverage numbers. Logan and Feliciano may end up in higher leverage situations than I anticipated due to different matchups and it’s possible that Joba and Robertson switch places in terms of who gets how many higher leverage innings. No matter what, though, I’m confident that the Yankee bullpen will be more than solid in 2011.

Jan 202011

The standard 'Joba looking beaten' pic for these posts

Many of us were holding out hope that the Yanks would at least consider letting Joba battle for battle for one of the open rotation spots in spring training, but apparently that’s not the case. Brian Cashman addressed this during the Q&A of yesterday’s Rafael Soriano press conference. Andrew Marchand of ESPN-NY has the report:

GM Brian Cashman and manager Joe Girardi stood united that Joba Chamberlain will be in the bullpen.

Even though Chamberlain’s career starting numbers are better than either Ivan Nova or Sergio Mitre, the Yankees say they will not consider making Chamberlain a starter.

“He’s in the bullpen,” Cashman said.

Chamberlain, barring injuries to Rafael Soriano and Mariano Rivera, will pitch in the fifth, sixth and seventh inning. Chamberlain has gone from season setup savior in 2007 to the Joba Rules back to the eighth inning and now to who knows what. His stock at 25 is at an all-time low and it doesn’t appear he is going to be a vital cog in the near future for the Yankees.

One thing is certainly true if Cashman and Girardi stick to their word, he will never start again for the Yankees.

Once upon a time back in 2008, we all debated the merits of Joba the future Closer vs Joba the mid level starter (Joba the ace-level starter was never debatable). Now, we have no idea who the 4th and 5th starter is, and still the Yanks would rather use him as a back of the bullpen reliever in the 6th/7th inning rather than get 175 inning and 30+ starts out of him. I discussed this yesterday with Mike Francesa, who as many Yankee fans in the NYC area will know has long been a champion of Joba in the bullpen. When asked where Joba would be more valuable, in the 6th or as a starter, even he said “it’s something I can’t argue anymore”. But the Yanks think this is his best usage and will not even look at him in spring training. They’ve clearly made up their minds on the topic.

I can understand the Yanks being down on Joba. When your manager is in better shape than one of your players is, it’s easy to view the glass as half empty and take a ‘show me’ attitude toward a player. Girardi sets a high standard of excellence for all of his players and one look at Joba and you know he’s not meeting it. From the day Joba was drafted, conditioning was one of the red flags attached to him, as well as the ability to maintain his stuff. He was 300 pounds in his early years in college, and 1. 4 mil will buy you a lot of Twinkees. I’ll be interested to see what kind of shape he shows up in this year, but judging by the past two springs I have little reason to believe this year will be any different. This website get a lot of attention last year when I reported a Billy Eppler quote that the debate was over, but at the time even I didn’t think that was etched in stone. Apparently, it is.

Jon Heyman reports that the Yankees were able to come to an agreement with their trio of arbitration-eligible pitchers. Phil Hughes got 2.7 million, Joba Chamberlain received 1.4 million, and Boone Logan scored 1.2 million. Avoiding arbitration hearings tends to be a positive for both sides, as the hearing can often get acrimonious and may impact the relationship between the club and the player. looking at the deals themselves, they each seem fair, although Logan may have gotten a smidge too much for a LOOGY.

It is also interesting to note the gap between the deals given to Phil Hughes and Joba Chamberlain. Joba being a reliever likely saved the Yankees between 1.0 and 1.3 million dollars or so. The conspiracy theorist in me believes that now that the Yankees are paying Joba on a reliever scale, they may be more likely to announce that he will be given a chance to earn a rotation slot in Spring Training. While the amount of money at stake here is a relative pittance for the Yankees, they had no reason to announce him as a possible starter before the settlement and possibly cost themselves that money. This is probably wishful thinking, and I am fairly certain Brian Cashman will dispel this notion once he emerges from hiding to discuss the Soriano deal. However, for the time being, I will just cross my fingers and hope that someone in the Yankees organization still believes in Joba the starter.

Jan 172011

With the acquisition of Rafael Soriano, David Robertson and Joba Chamberlain will likely see their roles in the Yankee bullpen reduced in 2011. Soriano will clearly be the set up man, the final brick in the mythical “Bridge to Mowhere” while Robertson and Chamberlain will be used as regular middle relievers. This doesn’t have much to do with the rest of the post, but I just wanted to throw it in: in 2010, the Joba + D-Rob combo out fWAR’d Soriano, and will likely do the same in 2011. In fairness, Soriano out bWAR’d the two. Anyway, onto the topic…

With Soriano in the picture, along with the addition of match up man/LOOGY Pedro Feliciano–not to mention the rising stock of David Robertson–Joba Chamberlain is definitely getting squeezed out of the late innings. There are three ways Joba can go.

Path One: He stays in the bullpen as a regular-but-more-expensive-because-of-his-arbitration middle reliever. At best, he’s now the third guy in line. Granted, that’s a pretty good position, but it’s not one that’s exactly hard to fill. David Robertson could fill the role just as well, and it’s doubtful we’d notice much (height, weight, and high socks aside).

Path Two: He’s given the chance to start again. Yes. Please. Do this. I’ve spilled enough digital ink on this subject so I’ll keep it short: I hope the Yankees let Joba Chamberlain start again.

Path Three: He’s traded. We’ve been discussing the notion of trading Joba Chamberlain since he lost out in the fifth starter “competition” after last Spring Training. I said then that I thought his value was incredibly low. After a 2010 that was disappointing to most despite good peripherals, his perceived value is likely even lower now. The only way Joba could help fetch a good piece in a deal–like a viable starting pitcher–is if he’s packaged with someone else who’s value is high right now. Signing Soriano hurt Joba’s trade value because it showed the rest of the league that (part of) the organization doesn’t believe Joba Chamberlain can even be a primary set up man at this point. There is no reason for any team to by Joba at the Yankees’ price right now. They cannot sell him as a top notch prospect anymore, and haven’t been able to since last year. They can’t sell him as a starter with upside, even though that’s basically what he is. If the Yankees don’t want him to start for their team, why should an “opposing” GM tell the Yankees he thinks that Joba can start? The Yankees can no longer sell him as an elite reliever now, because they don’t seem to think that of him anymore.

We hear this saying all the time and I think it applies here: Joba Chamberlain is worth more to the Yankees on the field than he is as a trade piece. If the right player comes along and the Yankees add Joba to a package to get that player, I won’t necessarily mind. The only problem is we don’t know who’s available and we don’t know what else the Yankees would have to give up. The trade market offers too many unknowns and Joba’s value is just too low at this point. Does Joba still have some upside left? Yes. Is he a better option than Sergio Mitre? Oh Mo yes. The best course of action is to re-start Joba.

FREE JOBA!!!!

With the Yanks signing of Rafael Soriano, the never ending Joba debate has reemerged in full force, with long time Joba the Starter supporters clamoring for him to return to the rotation. Mike Axisa of RAB penned a very entertaining piece to that effect yesterday. Rasheeda Cooper from Bomber Boulevard asks why not? Matt from the Yankeeist wants him traded, doesn’t care where, in the hopes that he can rebuild his value elsewhere. Andrew Marchand of ESPN NY thinks a return to the rotation could help the Yanks in 2011 and rebuild his value for a possible trade down the road. No matter which side you’re on, Joba always seems to spark discussion and inflame passions among Yankee fans.

Before we even get into breaking down Joba’s splits, let’s dispose of this report. There are no “viable starting pitchers” available so that possibility is an academic exercise, at best. The Yanks themselves have backed down from it, and Yankee officials should know better than to address hypothetical scenarios in public. But then again, they have their own issues these days.

Next, I wanted to look at Joba’s splits as a starter and reliever. Even after the Soriano signing, Yankee officials are still saying they have “no plans” to move him back to the rotation. I know this infuriates the Joba-Starter supporters, but it’s not an unreasonable position to take. The Yanks aren’t wrong when they say his stuff plays up as a reliever and he’s been much better in that role. He has, and it’s not arguable. Here’s his splits from BR:

I         Split   G  PA  AB   R   H 2B 3B HR SB CS  BB  SO SO/BB   BA  OBP  SLG  OPS  TB GDP HBP SH SF IBB ROE BAbip tOPS+
     as Starter  43 980 852 117 227 37  4 25 32 12 101 206  2.04 .266 .351 .407 .759 347  16  14  7  6   4   8  .322   114
    as Reliever 123 542 495  48 110 25  2  8 13  1  42 156  3.71 .222 .285 .329 .614 163   9   2  2  1   3   5  .307    74
I         Split  W L W-L%  ERA   G GS GF CG SHO SV    IP   H   R  ER HR  BB IBB  SO HBP BK WP  BF  WHIP SO/9 SO/BB
     as Starter 12 7 .632 4.18  43 43  0  0   0  0 221.2 227 117 103 25 101   4 206  14  4  8 980 1.480  8.4  2.04
    as Reliever  6 6 .500 3.08 123  0 26  0   0  4 131.2 110  48  45  8  42   3 156   2  1  7 542 1.154 10.7  3.71

One thing that jumps out at me right away are his walks as a starter. They’re abysmal. One might even say atrocious. He walked 101 batters in 221.2 IP, which effectively wipes away his other positive peripherals by allowing too many baserunners. His WHIP as a starter was almost 1.5 (1.15 as reliever). OPS against jumps almost 150 points as a starter as well. Pretty much every rate stat you look at gets worse when you compare the two roles. It’s as if they’re two different pitchers, one who’s effective and another who has potential, but is very frustrating.

But is there an explanation for all the walks? Was it because he was on the Joba Rules and hitters waited him out? Sure, that could have had a lot to do with it. Just getting into those deep counts meant he had to come in with 3-2 fastballs and is therefore all the more hittable. Did the league just catch up with him? I suspect that played a part as well. His go-to swing and miss pitch is the slider, and he rarely throws it for strikes. Hitters aren’t stupid, once they recognize the pitch as a slider (especially the 2nd and 3rd time through a lineup) they lay off and take their walks. His fastball is pretty straight and always has been, so when he gets it up in the zone it gets hammered. I don’t know where he found that 100MPH heat in 07. Maybe it was a result of building his arm up as a starter all year and switching to relief, or maybe it was a juiced radar gun. Maybe he was just a young kid who was scared to death out there and the adrenaline gave him that extra heat. But the scouting reports I saw of him as a college pitcher and in the Yankee farm system had him sitting in the low to mid 90s as a starter. So I really don’t think he permanently hurt his shoulder on that hot Texas night in 2008. Every pitcher gets shoulder tendinitis at some point of their career, and people forget Joba came back and pitched that same year out of the bullpen in September. I think Joba just reverted back to being who he always was before 2007. All of this is why I think all the excuse making surrounding Joba is just that. I don’t think he has the stuff to be an elite pitcher like we saw in 2007-08, which for me was a classic first time through the league effect. I have long felt he would be well served to work in his curve more often, if for no other reason to just to keep hitters off balance because there are basic flaws in his fastball-slider repertoire.

But with all his warts, I still think he’s better a option than Sergio Mitre or Ivan Nova as the #4 or 5 starter. So for that reason alone I’d like to see him given an opportunity to move back to the rotation. Without pre-judging the outcome, I think we can all agree that it wouldn’t hurt to let him throw his hat in the ring this March. The Yanks would be foolish not to give him an opportunity to win the job out of Spring Training, and despite unnamed quotes from members of the Yankee brass to the contrary, they usually wind up doing the right thing. Let’s not forget, Joba battled for a rotation spot as recently as last spring. Brian Cashman was quoted saying this after he lost the job to Phil Hughes last year:

“He’s a starter in the bullpen. He can do both. He’s a starter who was just beaten out in the competition. That’s what we honestly believe, but we only had one spot.”

The question for the 2011 Yankees isn’t Joba the Starter vs Joba the Reliever, the question is ‘Is Joba better than Sergio Mitre or Ivan Nova?’ Let’s hope we get a chance to answer that question in a few weeks.

Jan 072011

Last night in the River Avenue Blues open thread, a commenter asked what the Yankees would plan to do without Kerry Wood as the definite set-up man. I wanted the Yankees to bring back Wood at the right price, but he ended up taking a sweetheart deal to go pitch for the Cubs. However, as I responded in the thread, the Yankees will be just fine in the bullpen, even without Wood.

I fully expect David Robertson and Joba Chamberlain to do the set up job just fine. They combined for over 132 innings last year and could likely both handle a moderate inning increase–think about 10-15 innings between the two of them. That could apply more to Robertson, who pitched 61.1 innings last year. Chamberlain’s total was pretty high at 71.2. In fact, that total was the 7th highest among all American League relievers.

Chamberlain’s ERA wasn’t pretty in 2010, but there are indicators that 2011 will be better. Chamberlain’s K/9 was a shade under 10 at 9.67 and his 2.76 BB/9 is more than fine. He also dropped her his HR/9 to 0.75. The 45.6 GB% is also encouraging, and I would expect that .342 BABIP to drop. His 66.6% strand rate was rather low, too. I think we can count on a better strand rate in 2011.

Robertson, as usual, still had the strikeouts working for him (10.42 per nine). The walks were still there for him at 4.84 BB/9, but he upped his GB% to just under 40% and also dropped his HR/9 to 0.73. There aren’t any apparent red flags for Robertson, and I’m confident in his ability to repeat 2010, or at least come close to it. If Chamberlain can repeat everything from 2010, while lowering his ERA, he and Robertson will make up a formidable set-up combination. They won’t have to bear the load alone. And, while both Joba and D-Rob can pitch well enough against lefties, they will be helped by lefty specialists Boone Logan and Pedro Feliciano. The four of those pitchers can make up a solid bridge to Mowhere.

That doesn’t mean, though, that the Yankees shouldn’t at least think about adding another reliever. I’ve argued for Brian Fuentes, but he wants to close and may want a relatively long term deal. Jon Rauch is also a possibility , but there’s been no market on him, so we have no idea what it will take to get him. I think Rauch could come relatively cheaply and he would be a welcomed addition.

What roles we may not be sure of are the non-late inning roles. The long relief role seems absolutely wide open. It could be someone out of the organization right now; it could be Sergio Mitre; it could be Ivan Nova. IT COULD BE MARK PRIOR! (No, no it couldn’t. Sigh.) Like it usually is, I think this role–along with the non-Mo/Joba/Robertson/Feliciano/Logan roles–will be rather fluid, like it tends to be each and every year.

Dec 222010

Friend of the blog Steve H made a fascinating comparison on Twitter last night that highlights the power of perception and narrative in sports:

Player A: 74.2 IP, 9.16 K/9, 3.62 BB/9, .72 HR/9, 1.93 ERA, 3.37 FIP, 3.59 xFIP
Player B: 71.2 IP, 9.67 K/9, 2.76 BB/9, .75 HR/9, 4.40 ERA, 2.98 FIP, 3.34 xFIP

The analysis here is pretty simple. The two players are very similar across the board, with the peripherals favoring Player B by a bit. The difference, of course, comes from Player B having a .342 BABIP (20 points above his career levels) and a 66.6 LOB%, compared to a .225 BABIP and 86.0 LOB% for Player A. Basically, Player A was lucky while Player B was unlucky, such that the perception of the two players is vastly different despite very similar performances.

Player A is Daniel Bard. Bard is seen as a relief ace, and many thought the Red Sox might non-tender Jonathan Papelbon and let Bard take over the closer role on a potential playoff team. He is certainly the closer-in-waiting, and is perceived as being one of the hot young arms in the sport.

Player B is Joba Chamberlain, who is viewed by many to be a massive disappointment. A “failure” as a starter and underwhelming last season as a reliever, he has become the player most frequently inserted into random trade proposals by Yankees fans. Some have suggested that the Yankees do not see him as being a big part of their future, and his stock is certainly far lower than Bard’s.

And yet, the numbers show that Joba was about as good as Bard was last season, and that with a little bit of luck, the perception about him would likely be vastly different. Furthermore, Bard is actually 3 months older than Chamberlain, a fact that would surprise most but suggests that they are on equal footing in terms of development. I do not mean to suggest that Joba was actually better than Bard in 2010, as there is something to be said for ERA and results, such that I would not explain all of Joba’s struggles away using the “luck” factor. But the peripherals clearly tell us that these two pitchers should be regarded similarly, and I would be far from shocked if Joba and Bard put forth extremely similar seasons in 2011.

Yesterday, the Yankees lost out on two bullpen options: Kerry Wood–who signed a “sweetheart” deal with the Cubs–and Bobby Jenks, who signed with the Red Sox for two years. Apparently, the former turned down a more lucrative deal from the White Sox, so it seems like his heart was set on going back to the Cubs. As for the latter, going to the Sox is definitely better for him. It’s a lot more likely that he could take over for Jonathan Papelbon than for Mariano Rivera. I can’t blame Jenks for going to Boston.

This leaves one big relief pitching free agent left: Rafael Soriano. We heard yesterday that the Yankees were in then not in on the former Rays reliever. In terms of talent and results, Soriano is definitely the best choice. Of course, he’ll come at a hefty price. He’s a closer and will want closer money. Obviously, the chances of him closing for the Yankees are very tiny.

Aside from money, there’s the draft pick compensation. Soriano is a type-A free agent, so signing him means forfeiting a draft pick in 2011. This draft is, apparently, very deep, and Brian Cashman has gone on record before saying that the Yankees do not want to give up draft picks for the sake of signing a reliever. This is a policy I agree with it. I could get behind signing Soriano if he (somehow) takes a cheap deal, but I wouldn’t even think of holding my breath on that one.

Internally, I think the Yankees are set for the “8th inning” role. Joba Chamberlain and David Robertson (with the occasional Boone Logan appearance thrown in for good measure) should be able to handle the ever important (yes, this is dripping with sarcasm) set up role. All three are cheap and the latter two have the potential to be closers one day.

My preference is for the Yankees to roll with Joba and D-Rob, since they’re much cheaper than any external option and the step down would not be all that big from a big name reliever.

What do you guys think? Should the Yankees get back onto the Soriano Train or should they roll with what they’ve got in the ‘pen already?

Dec 112010

The waiting game being played out between Cliff Lee and the Yankees and Rangers has to be disconcerting to most Yankee fans by now. Recent reports during the winter meetings that he and/or his agent met with the Texas Rangers brass 4 times, and the Yanks only twice, adds further fuel to the fire that he’s leaning toward Texas, or at least giving them every opportunity to come up with an offer he can live with.

To paraphrase the great Football coach Vince Lombardi, Cliff Lee isn’t everything, he’s the only thing. I know that some fans think that the Yanks, with their enormous resources, will find someone comparable who can take the ball every 5th day and give the team a chance to win. Now of course they’ll find somebody, they’re not going to forfeit every 5th game in 2011. You can always find a Chad Gaudin-type floating around in free agency or the waiver wires. Maybe there’s a mid-rotation starter out there to be had via trade from a team like the White Sox, whose GM Kenny Williams is always up for a deal. But the notion that it will be someone comparable to Cliff Lee, someone with top of the rotation ability, is simply unfounded. Or in the case of Zach Grienke, I would argue ill conceived.

With this in mind, I wanted to take a minute to ponder what the Yankee rotation would look like without Lee. As things stand currently, that would mean Ivan Nova would be the Yankee #5 starter with CC, Burnett, Hughes and Pettitte filling out the starting five. The Yanks generally don’t like to enter a season barely having 5 starters, which is what this rotation would represent. The team would look better if they pick up a back of the rotation type on a 1 year deal, so if things go south they can always cut bait around mid-season. Looking at the list of available free agent starters they would be choosing from pitchers such as Bruce Chen, Jeff Francis, Dave Bush, Freddy Garcia, Brian Burres, Rodrigo Lopez, Jeff Suppan, or Kevin Millwood. Those are the healthy guys, for a more speculative bet on upside you have your choice of Erik Bedard, Brandon Webb, Brad Penny, Justin Duchscherer, Chien-Ming Wang, Chris Young, and Ben Sheets. We don’t even need to discuss Carl Pavano. I have trouble making a case for anything above a minor league invite or a low base incentive-laden deal for any pitcher on that list. Given the dearth of available starters and the sky-high prices free agents are going for this year, any of the guys with even a hint of ability on that list will command more than that.  

Further complicating matters is that, as we all know, Andy Pettitte is currently leaning towards retirement. We can all hope that if the Yankee situation is desperate enough, Andy will come in riding on a white horse and save the day. But we can’t count on that. Living with Ivan Nova as your #5 is one thing, but penciling him in as your #4 and filling in with someone from that above list or the next guy on the Yankee depth chart (David Phelps or Hector Noesi) is something they simply can’t live with. Not in the AL East, not with the Red Sox making the upgrades they already have this off season. If Andy retires, I have to think the Yanks would revisit Joba Chamberlain in the starting rotation. They may even let him and Nova battle things out in spring training if just the 5th spot is open. That’s what they did with him and Hughes this past spring, and Ivan Nova has never been viewed by prospect watchers as having the ability of Phil. Despite his sub-par 2010 campaign, Joba still has more upside as a starter than Nova, who lacks a true swing and miss pitch and relies mostly on his heavy, sinking fastball. We know it’s not their preference, but if Andy bows out and they come in second in the Cliff Lee sweepstakes, I think revisiting Joba the starter becomes unavoidable as things stand currently.

© 2011 TYU Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha