IMPORTANT BLOG ANNOUNCEMENT

PLEASE CHANGE YOUR BOOKMARKS AND FEEDS TO THE NEW URL, YANKEEANALYSTS.COM. TYU IS IN NO WAY AFFILIATED WITH THE NEW YORK YANKEES OR YANKEES UNIVERSE.

Tom Gaffney

My gut instinct, upon looking at the schedule, was to dig in my heels against it.  I had heard, as most of you have, the famous 4.65 ERA statistic for pitchers on 3 days rest since the wildcard era began (see here – prior to 2009).  A closer examination of that arguments, however, shows just how insufficient and misleading that statistic actually is. Yes, since 1995, ERA’s on short rest have been bad, but that statistic does not tell the entire story.  There are some serious problems with using that statistic in a blanket fashion, as most sportswriters have been doing.

It’s still a fairly small sample size.  If you look at games since 1969, here, ERA on 3 days rest is  3.85, which is only a fraction higher than 4 days rest (3.60).  Yes, each era is different but this statistic shows that, physiologically, there isn’t a huge problem with pitching on short rest.  Naturally, then, some guys are going to be able to do well in this situation, while others will struggle.

So, naturally, we have to look at each guy and judge each case individually to see whether it’s a good idea.  You have to examine each pitcher’s size, body type, throwing motion, stuff, makeup, and work load, as well as their track record on short rest.  Fortunately, each of these pitchers has something of a history on 3 days rest that we can look at.  I already examined CC, here, and it’s become even more obvious since then that he is one of those rare guys who is built for this exact type of scenario.  Even if he doesn’t have his absolute best fastball, he has a fantastic makeup and 2 other plus plus pitches to go to.  So, how does AJ Burnett stack up?

One pitcher who DOES rely on sheer power, however, is AJ Burnett.  He’s the guy who initially concerned me when I looked at the schedule.  AJ has more of a lanky build than CC or Andy, and went through a variety of nagging injuries throughout his early career which made some question his toughness.  His makeup has also been frequently targeted as his statistics have never matched up to his stuff.  His lack of focus in allowing big innings would seem to make him one of the last guys you would want on short rest, battling without his very best stuff.

His numbers, however, would seem to bely these observations.  He is a career 4-0 with a stellar 3.25 ERA and 1.074 WHIP on 3 days rest.  His stuff does not seem to suffer much on short rest (8.0 k/9 vs 8.7 on 4 days).  The only cause for concern is the miniscule baBIP of .233 (compared to .293 on normal rest) which could indicate luck or it could mean that guys aren’t getting good swings off of him. Regardless, though, his numbers (small sample size notwithstanding) are much better than I would have thought.  As we saw on Thursday, he is capable of throwing his curve at a high volume and still be unhittable.  It may be that, when he doesn’t have his best heater, and he’s a little tired, he throws more curveballs and is even less hittable (though I don’t have access to those numbers to back that up).  It could simply be the case that, in a big spot, when he’s tired and anxious, he’s actually focusing more than in a typical game on 4 days rest.  Or this could be a simple case of sample size.  I’d have to say, though, looking at the numbers makes me think that Joe should take the plunge and give AJ a shot on short rest.  We seem to have a better chance of getting a good start out of him than Gaudin, who hasn’t pitched regularly in a long time.

So what do you guys think?  If  Pettitte is good tonight, do we start A.J. and hope he continues his recent form, or try Gaudin and the pen for multiple innings?

Update: Sorry, I ran out of time to cover Andy Pettitte on short rest. Here we go:

Andy Pettitte:

Andy, in many ways, profiles as the exact opposite to A.J. Burnett.  His body, pitching style and makeup are all ideally suited for coming back on short rest.  He has the prototypical wide shoulders and beefy lower half (yes, that’s exactly what you think it is) that characterizes a workhorse.  He’s thrown 200+ regular season innnings on 10 separate occasions.  His makeup is also off the charts, with a reputation as one of the toughest pitchers in the game, he is the ultimate battler.  He once went through a whole season in Houston while clearly needing elbow surgery and only able to throw an n 85 mph fastball.  Even if he does get tired and lacks his best stuff on 3 days rest, he can find a way to grit through the outing on sheer guts.

His numbers, however, unlike Burnett, suffer noticeably on short rest (4-6, 4.15 ERA, 1.43 WHIP in 14 career starts on 3-day rest).  These statistics, however are possibly a little deceiving.  He had two seasons which spike all of his stats: 1995, he allowed 7 earned runs in two starts (9.2 innings).  I think it’s safe to toss out that season, however, as it was his rookie season and he’d thrown far more innings than he’d ever thrown in his career.  His awful 2001 start against the D-backs in the World Series, however, you have to, at least, take into consideration.  That was his second start on short rest, however, while this would be the first time he’d be asked to do this by Girardi.  Joe has also been very careful to keep Andy well rested and he’s had many extra rest days in the postseason so the danger of a real stinker should be lessened.  Take out those two bad years and you have ERA’s of 3.46, 3.66, 2.01, & 3.79 – not too shabby.

Oct 252009

It’s very clear, from the media reaction today, that the weather postponement of last night’s game will have the classic positive/negative/no effect on the Yankees chances to advance to the World Series.  Apparently, nothing encourages random, baseless speculation like a rainout, folks!  So let’s look at what people are saying and throw our own hats into the ring, shall we?

On the negative side of the ledger, we have John Paul Morosi, for Fox Sports, writing that the rainout benefits the Angels because it allows them to start Lackey in Game 7, a notion which Peter Abraham also agrees with, here.   Richard Griffin (thestar.com) feels that pushing Sabathia back a day could throw off his rhythm.  CC is a guy who seems to thrive on short rest, so there could be something to that.

Arguing the other side of things is Joe Lemire for CNNSI, who says that the rainout could help the Yankee pen.  He says that Hughes is particularly tough on two days rest, noting that in, “24 appearances with two or more days’ rest, he gave up one earned run in 29 2/3 innings, a 0.30 ERA.”  He also states that Mariano has gotten a lot of work so far, and a rested Mo is always a good thing.  Of course, the Angels pen has gotten a lot more work than the Yanks’, so wouldn’t that help them even more? You could argue that the back of the Yankee pen is better, so more rest favors the Yankees, but it’s a close one.

Anthony DiComo, from MLB.com, on the other hand, totally steals MY thunder with the copout take of: it will benefit some and hurt others (well, it’s a copout when HE uses it – when I write it, it’s balanced and enlightened).  He says the time off may help Swisher snap out of his slump, but throw off Pettitte and CC.  To muddle things even further, DiComo uses quotes from players, saying that Pettitte stated how frustrating it was, not getting to start last night.  Hey, DiComo, didn’t you read my intro – you’re supposed to write BASELESS speculation, enough of this “journalism” garbage.

DiComo continues his annoyingly reasonable tone by quoting Joe Girardi, who says,

“Each guy is different,” Girardi said. “It could be helpful. It could be hurtful. You are really not going to know. One thing you know is certain guys react different to different circumstances. And that’s the one thing that, as a manager, you can’t really predict. I don’t know if it helps our guys, hurts our guys. Only time will tell.”

What Girardi does know, however, is that he has a veteran core to his team and that those players are unlikely to be affected by this unexpected rest.

“Our guys know how to handle it,” Girardi said. “The interesting thing is we’ve had a lot of rain in New York this year. So we’ve been through this a lot.”

Way to suck the fun out of the room, DiComo.  This isn’t the old days, where journalists generally tried to write responsible, well supported articles with genuine scope and perspective, you know.  Please delete this and write a nice, lopsided polemic, preferably with foam dripping out of it’s mouth.  You’re making my job much more difficult, sir.  What do you guys think is the biggest advantage of the rainout?  Lackey starting game 7 (if necessary)?  CC and Andy getting thrown off their schedule?  Mo and Hughesie getting some extra rest?

As a fan, streaky hitters are one of the most aggravating facets of baseball.  It seems inexplicable how a guy can carry a team one month and be an anchor the next.  Nick Swisher, right now, is an absolute anchor.  It’s come to the point where the Angels will walk every hitter before him to get to Slumpy McSwingsandmissesalot.  Swish is no longer his nickname, but the sound the ball makes as it passes by his bat.  Yankee fans have had to deal with this in the past, of course, with Bernie Williams, but that’s not much of a consolation.  Right now, he’s absolutely killing us, while tomorrow, we could be tossing laurels at him.

How streaky is this guy?  How quickly can he flip ends?  Just look at his first two months.  Keep in mind that the month-by-month stats, if anything, wind up smoothing out the bumps, as a hot streak in the beginning of one month could ameliorate the slump at the end.  Even so, the monthly stats show an absurd amount of variance between them.  Streaky?  Just look at his first two months: April OPS: 1.144.  May OPS: .586!!!  What the heck happened in May?  Did they start putting kryptonite into the balls?  His next several months are like a roller coaser ride: .885, .777, .878, .949, .741 and, of course, a playoff OPS of .350 (yech!).

Is this season representative of Swisher’s streakiness?  You bet it is.  Check out his 2008 monthly stats: .701, .547, 1.032, .676, .876, .546.  Contrast these numbers to Derek Jeter’s stats this year: .807, .870, .808, .902, .970, .824.  No month has more than .150 difference between it and the next.  Swisher, on the other hand, has months that vary more than .600 points!!  Reaching further back, Nick has always had multiple months in the .500 & .600 ranges and other months above 1.000.  Even the notoriously slow starting Bernie Williams would rarely have any months below .800 in his prime years.

When will he snap out of his funk?  It’s impossible to tell.  He has shown the ability to turn things around very, very quickly, but the nature of the postseason might make it more difficult for him to accomplish this.  As one of the most patient hitters in all of baseball, he is completely incapable of expanding his hitting zone with any success.  The stress of the playoffs sometimes pushes players to attempt to do more than they can and this might be part of what is maintaining Nick’s current run of bad form.  Once he starts trying to do too much, he’s completely helpless against the very good hurlers the Angels have.  He has to stay within himself and not press.  If he can do that, he still has a chance to be a big contributor.

Rumors are now flying (see here) that Swisher could or should be benched.  If not benched, he may also be moved down in the order in favor of the streaking Melky Cabrera.  Nick maintains that, “It takes one swing to get back on track… It’s one of those things where you want to do well, but it just hasn’t happened. Sometime it’s going to happen.”  What do you guys think?  Should he sit in favor of Gardner?  Should he be moved down in the order, or should Joe just sit tight and hope that the slump is about to end?

Oct 202009

I agree and disagree with Steve’s article.  I agree that Joe is getting way too much flack about previous moves that clearly have worked out.  I disagree about the Robertson move, however.  Joe not only miscalculated the matchup (debatable) but he also completely ignored what his eyes told him about the form of his pitcher on the mound that night.   This, too, has to enter into the equation, and I feel like Girardi ignored that factor when making his decision.

The matchup question is debatable.  Steve brings up some fantastic statistics, and it’s true that Kendrick struggles most against sliders, but Aceves does not have a nasty slider or any nasty breaking pitches, so the edge is slight at best.  Robertson has the best breaking pitch between the two of them with his filthy curveball, and his fastball is clearly better, so you could argue that the matchup edge is even or favors D-Rob.  Different pitchers have different sliders and Ace has never faced Kendrick before, so you really can’t tell.  If anything, there’s only a slight edge in Ace’s favor.

That slight edge should be overwhelmed by the rule of form.  Use your eyes: how is this guy pitching?  D-Rob has been pitching very well of late and the only two batters against him to that point had no good swings against him.  His form was excellent, while Aceves’ form was uncertain.  This was not Manny Ramirez in his prime we were facing, here, it was Howie Kendrick.  A good pitcher, in good form, spotting his pitches well, as Robertson was, will get out a good hitter.   Howie Kendrick is not a special, elite player.  If you throw good pitches, you’ll get him out.

Taking out a pitcher who’s clearly throwing good pitches for another pitcher who has no clear, overwhelming matchup advantage is ill-advised.  You have no idea whether Aceves will have his best stuff on any given night, while you already know that D-Rob has good stuff that night.  As Joe should have learned earlier with Joba, there’s always a decent chance on any night that the pitcher you bring in will either just not have it, or will need a few batters to get into his rhythm.  Robertson is already pitching with rhythm.   I love Joe and I love that he uses stats and data extensively in his analysis, but I’d hate to see him become completely reliant upon statistics and scouting reports to the point where he completely ignores his gut, his eyes, common sense, and the current form of the players he has on his team.

We all know that CC Sabathia has the body, the rubber arm and the attitude to be successful on 3 days rest. We all remember that he did it with the Brewers last year with success, but what are his actual statistics on short rest?  Is there any chink in his armor that might forebode disaster: a bad start, a low k/9, an increase in walks, perhaps?  Thanks to BaseballReference.com, it’s pretty easy to find out and you can check it out at this link, here.

The short answer is, no, there are no bad signs at all to be found anywhere in his numbers on 3 days rest.  In fact, the only scary thing about his stats are how good they are.  In every single category, he betters his numbers on regular rest.  k/9: 8.8 to 7.4, k/bb: 4.33 to 2.77, ERA: 1.01 to 3.66, OPS against: .413 to .684, WHIP 0.825 to 1.218.  He’s pretty much been awesome on short rest with 2 caveats: a small sample size (only 4 games) and a low BAbip (.239 to .291) which may indicate that he had his share of luck in these starts.

Of course, those starts don’t factor in the poor playoff outing last year which was probably caused by the consecutive starts on 3 days rest.  This shouldn’t be an issue, as CC will go back to normal rest for game 7.  All in all, it’s possible that CC may actually be BETTER on short rest on Tuesday.  There’s certainly no statistical evidence that he’ll suffer.  What do you guys think?  Any predictions for his outing?  I’m going with 7 innings, 2 runs (and hopefully a 4th game sweep).

I was listening to Buck Showalter on the Michael Kay Show the other day and, much as I love Buck from his tenure as Yankee manager, he said something that didn’t seem right to me.  Upon being pressed by Kay for a prediction, he wound up reluctantly picking the Angels in 7 games.   This is not suprising, as the Angels are a tremendous team that has had a tone of success in the Bronx over the last several years.  The reason Buck gave, however, was that the Angels lefthanders could take away Cano, Matsui, and Damon while turning around the Yankee switch-hitters.  He also lauded the move to start Saunders (a lefty) tonight for that reason.  He particularly singled out the Angel relievers Fuentes and Oliver as being instrumental in the late innings against the Yankee lefties and switch-hitters.  He also reiterates some of those sentiments on ESPN, here.

I was pretty surprised upon hearing these ideas.  My first thought, as are most of yours, I’m sure, is Matsui?  I thought it was pretty common knowledge that Matsui is generally just as good or even better against lefties.  Buck usually gives pretty deep analysis, but in this case, he didn’t give any numbers to back up his theory, so I figured that I’d take a look at the stats and see if there’s anything at all to this idea.  There are lots of lefties that hit lefties and plenty of lefty pitchers that aren’t necessarily that much better against lefties than righties.  So do the Yankees have a bit of a weakness against lefties?  Are the Angels pure death against lefthanded batters?

Let’s first look at Matsui, which seems, at first glance, to be an obviously ridiculous misstatement by Showalter, but maybe he’s struggled more than I remember against lefties.  Let’s see here….ummmm… nope.  Matsui has an absurd .976 OPS against lefties while hittining .835 against righties.  Gee, he’ll sure be quaking in his cleats against those Angel lefties, huh?  What about Cano, surely he’ll back up Buck’s thesis, right?  Wrong, Robbie is also better against lefties (though closer: .876 to .868).  Damon is the only Yankee lefty who is actually worse against lefties (.889 to .776).

What about the Angels pitchers, though?  Possibly they are so ridiculously tough against lefties that even guys like Cano and Matsui can’t touch them.  The Angels’ starter tonight, Joe Saunders, is definitely tougher against lefties than righties (.692 to .827 OPS), but it’s not like he’s unhittable.  CC Sabathia, for example, has a much, much lower OPS against (.560).  Fuentes is tough (.589 OPS against), but Oliver is actually worse against lefties than righties (.705 to .600).

When you look at the Angels’ batting average agains lefthanded hitting, you see that Buck’s argument has zero basis in reality.  The Angels are actually THE WORST TEAM IN ALL OF BASEBALL against lefty hitters, with a .290 BAA.  Opposing lefties hit .290 against the Angels, yet neutralizing the Yankee lefties is the key to this series?  Much as I love Buck, it’s pretty clear that he mailed this one in, making only a superficial observation with zero deep analysis to back it up.  It’s a common fallacy to just look at left-handedness and make snap judgements about how they perform against other lefties without acknowledging individual differences.  Come on, Buck, it’s bad enough we have to listen to that idiot, McCarver.  Don’t you start making moronic statements as well.  Do your homework.

Oct 142009

Thus goes the great line from the cult classic (does it qualify as a cult classic?) Highlander.  The same motif applies for this World Series.  So what’s the deal with these deluded Angels fans saying that their side is a “team of destiny”.  Huh?  Everyone knows that the YANKEES are the team of destiny.  There can’t be TWO teams of destiny.  There can be only one!  Not two or three or seven, but one.  Was Neo in the Matrix, “the two?”  No, he was “the one”.  How does “the anointed two” sound?  Not so good, huh?  The anointed one, however, now that has a ring to it.  Destiny doesn’t work in twos, folks.  How did these poor, benighted Angels fans get this insane idea into their heads?   Aside: it is requiring every ounce of self control to prevent myself from launching into a ubernerdy ramble about how the Yankees represent Russell Nash (the Highlander) and who the Kurgan is and… must stop.

To their fans, both the Angels and the Yankees have the whiff of predestination about them.  In my mind, I can only think, “how can they lose?” when I think about all the great moments this season has provided and how everything has seemed to magically come into place.  When I look objectively at the Angels, however, I can see how they (those poor deluded souls) could feel like THEY are the team of destiny, not the Yankees, at all.  Let’s see who has more destiny on their side (that lady sure is fickle):

Yankees

A-Rod: In order to have a sense of destiny, you need to overcome some sort of adversity, emerging stronger and more focused.  Nowhere is this more evident for the Bombers than in A-Rod.  Steroids, coming clean, getting injured, coming back, overcoming his choking in the playoffs, overcoming his issues with teammates and becoming part of a close-knit team, overcoming divorce and now he’s with a movie star girlfriend.  It’s all very Hollywood.  Lots of other individual diversity exists, with Posada, Matsui, and Pettitte all coming back from injuries and Jeter, Swisher, and Cano all having comeback years.

Drama: The Yanks are the kings of the walk-off this year, with one victory topping the next for dramatic effect.

Feel Good Stories: It’s hard not to root for guys like Jeter and Rivera.  The A-Rod angle is certainly dramatic and it’s always nice to see a guy overcoming his problems, but on the other hand, some of his issues have been self-propagating.

Symmetry: In their championship slump era, the Yanks seem to be owned every year by the selfsame Angels.  It would certainly be poetic to go through them in order to reclaim their rightful crown.  Even more elegant would be beating their old Manager (Torre) and nemesis (Manny) in the World Series.

Angels

Adversity: Much of this has to do with overcoming the tragic death of their teammate, Nick Adenhart on April 9th of this year.  The team has really banded together and it would be a fitting tribute for them to win it all in his honor.  They have also had to fight through countless injuries to both their pitching staff and position players, yet have scarcely missed a beat.

Drama: How about beating the dreaded Red Sox’ closer in the 9th inning to advance?  This was especially dramatic, being that the Sox’ had owned the Angels in the playoffs every year up until 2009.  There’s also a sense of drama when you have injuries and guys step up, as they’ve had all year.  Finally, what could be more dramatic than that Adenhart billboard at the end of game 3?

Feel Good Stories: See Nick Adenhart – nuff said.  Angels have the edge, here.

Symmetry: The Angels had to beat the dreaded Red Sox who have dominated them in recent years.  They are going against Mark Teixeira, who spurned them for the Yankees.  They could be going against their cross-town rivals in the World Series, creating an all-LA finale.

What do you guys think?  Which is the real team of destiny?  There can be only one!!!

I keep using the word magic to describe this team, but with all the alliterative P’s in play tonight, I couldn’t help but feel this victory was pure poetry.  How fitting is it that, the night the Yankees move on to the ALCS, they have to go through Carl Pavano, of all people?  The American Idle may be the foremost symbol of Yankee futility for the past 8 years.  By moving past the Twins and Pavano, the Yanks are symbolically putting the past few years behind them.

The symmetry doesn’t end there, however.  Who are the heroes tonight?  It was almost like turning back the clock, as Pettitte is nearly perfect for 6.1, Posada hits the winning home run and drives in another with a clutch 9th inning single, Jeter makes a classic heads up Derek Jeter defensive play, and Mo comes in for archetypal 4 out Mariano save.

This is not to say that there weren’t contributions by the ringless members of the team.  On the contrary, this victory was a melding of the new and old as A-Rod continued to dominate with the huge game-tying bomb and a big walk and run scored in the top of the 9th to secure the victory.  Nick Swisher also made a heads-up defensive play of his own, throwing out Cuddyer at second on a single under Robbie Cano’s glove.  The Yanks looked like the fundamentally sound team of the dynasty era as the Twins made baserunning blunder after baserunning blunder all series.

Want more poetry?  Who’s the team that the Yankees have never been able to beat in this Championship-free era: the Angels.  Who beat the Yankees and won the World Series at the beginning of this era: the Angels.  Who do the Yankees play next round in the ALCS: those same Angels.

I was going to break down the pitching matchups for game 3, but John Flaherty does a brilliant job on the lohud blog, here, that I couldn’t possibly hope to match.  To sum up: Pettitte’s done a great job of pitching to both sides of the plate, but needs to hit spots and can’t afford to make many mistakes at this point in his career.  There’s also some concern over having a week between starts which may cause some rust.  Pavano (The American Idle) has a good, sinking 2-seamer.  When that pitch is really going well, he’s tough, but Flaherty thinks his baggage may cause him to be overwhelmed by the moment.

My take on Flaherty’s assessment is that, if Flaherty’s correct, this should make for a good matchup for Andy.  The Twins will grind out hits, but they are not a team with a ton of power that will punish mistakes with long, elegantly curling home runs.  Therefore, Andy should be able to work through any rust without putting himself in a huge hole.  If he gives the Yankess three runs through 6+, they should have a good chance of sweeping the pesky Twins.  I’d like to also add that Pettitte, as a lefty, has an added edge against the overly left handed Twins

I’m somewhat in disagreement over John’s take on Pavano.  As lazy, annoying, and frustrating as he is, Carl Pavano has actually generally rose to the occasion in big spots.  His problems have often been based in conditioning and mindset over the long haul of a season, not in short series and big games.  He has a 2.70 ERA against the Yanks this year and a stellar 1.40 ERA in 8 postseason games (some as a reliever).  I think we might be in for a solid, if hard-to-swallow, pitching performance by the Idler tonight.

What do you guys think?  Will Carl blow up tonight or will he reach back for something extra and give the Yanks a hard time at the plate?

Oct 102009

Once upon a time, there was a great king of a distant land called Minnesota.  He stood on top of a high hill, he could make smoke come out of his hands and his name was Santana.   The people from Boston, New York and Los Angeles all wanted Santana to come and become King of their lands.  They offered lavish gifts, like frankincense, myrrh, and melkies, but only one of them could win his services.  In the end, the people of Minnesota decided to send him to the kingdom of Queens but the people in all the other lands were left to wonder whether the people of Minnesota (otherwise known as the Billsmiths) made the right decision.  “The gifts of the people of Queens were no good,” they said, “our gifts were much better.”

Now, I think, might be a good time to revisit that trade and see if the Twins were right to pick the Mets as trading partners instead of the numerous other suitors – including the Yankees.  It seemed like an odd deal at the time, when many felt that Smith could have had Phil Hughes, Clay Bucholtz, Jed Lowrie, Melky Cabrera, Jon Lester, or Austin Jackson, among others.  Instead, Bill Smith, the Twins first-year GM, dealt for Carlos Gomez, Deolis Guerra, Kevin Mulvey, Jacoby Ellsbury, and Philip Humber.  How are these players performing now, and did it work out for the Twins?  Let’s see:

Carlos Gomez: He’s simply awful .277 wOBA: .229/.287/.337 – one of the worst hitters in the big leagues.  No power, no average, no on-base.  The only quality he has is speed and even that seems diminished.  The Yankees would have included Brett Gardner as a(.337 wOBA: .270/.345/.379) virtual toss-in and he has similar tools but is a much, much better hitter.  Melky, too, at .331 WOBA:  .274/.336/.416 would have been a better choice.  Austin Jackson is also likely to have a superior career.  Ellsbury, as well, is a clear improvement.

Philip Humber: The, supposedly, top pitching prospect in the deal is even worse than Gomez.  He has a 5.34 ERA….. IN AAA!  I don’t think I’m going out on any big limb in predicting that, at almost 27 already, he’ll never be even a decent major league pitcher.  Hughes is already a top, top, top 8th inning guy at only 23 and still projects as either a top-of-the-rotation guy or elite closer.   Justin Masterson still projects as a mid-rotation guy and, if you compare IPK’s AAA stats, he blows Humber away at a younger age.  Despite the injury, IPK has a much bigger upside right now than Humber, now that he’s returned.

Kevin Mulvey: 5-8, 3.93 ERA, 6.83 K/9 in AAA this year.  Mulvey is better than Humber, but that doesn’t say much.  Again, even a guy like IPK (also 24 years-old, 5-3, 2.35 ERA, 9.39 K/9 last year in AAA), who has struggled since the deal, still projects much better than Mulvey.

Deolis Guerra: 6-8, 4.89 in AA at least still has youth so, at age 20, there still is some upside.  The downside is that, well, he kind of sucks.  He still could put it together, but there are a million guys like this wallowing around the minors (ahemDellin Betances!).

There’s no question that minor league baseball players are notoriously hard to project, but Smith has to take some heat, here.  We can’t tell, exactly, what was on the table, but he seemed to, but his statements in the press, have an axe to grind against the Yankees and possibly the Red Sox.  He seemed to take  a much poorer deal than he could have had, if he had courted the Yankees instead of overplaying his hand.  He also made a deal, that summer, for Delmon Young, trading away talented sinkerballer, Matt Garza and stud SS, Jason Bartlett.  That trade has not worked out, either, as Young has struggled (paltry .312 wOBA and terrible fielding), while Garza and Bartlett have flourished.  In three short years, Smith has managed to trade away some of Terry Ryan’s (his brilliant predecessor) best acquisitions, and replace them with very, very little, indeed.  It’s tough to follow a genius like Terry Ryan, but Smith seems to have proven that he has no idea how to make a big trade.

© 2011 TYU Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha