IMPORTANT BLOG ANNOUNCEMENT

PLEASE CHANGE YOUR BOOKMARKS AND FEEDS TO THE NEW URL, YANKEEANALYSTS.COM. TYU IS IN NO WAY AFFILIATED WITH THE NEW YORK YANKEES OR YANKEES UNIVERSE.

An interesting post from Dan Szymborski of Baseball Think Factory renown over at ESPN:

What would this AL East race look like if the Sox had stayed healthy?

….For those five starters, there were a combined 996 missed plate appearances compared to what would be expected.

Those 996 plate appearances had to go somewhere, so to do the next phase of this projection, I had to take them back from the guys who got them. I tried to be as fair as I could — Daniel Nava and Ryan Kalish lost the most, as did players like Bill Hall.

Then I used runs created, a Bill James stat. I created an estimate of how many runs the replacements created in those 996 plate appearances — and how many the injured players would have likely created. For the injured players, I used their preseason ZiPS projections as a guide to how they likely would have played, given their normal playing time.

The five injured starters would have created 153 runs; the replacements created 114. That’s a difference of 39 runs, which equates to roughly four wins.

If you look at the AL East standings, that makes the Red Sox a 78-53 team as opposed to their current status as a 74-57 team; they’d be three games back of the New York Yankees and Tampa Bay Rays, as opposed to their current seven games back.

I did not want to reproduce the entire article, and was forced to snip out some of the analysis. I highly recommend reading the original article to make sure you capture the context of his calculations.

Dan’s conclusion seems about right. One thing that the saber revolution has taught us is that even the greatest players tend to be worth only 6-7 wins more than a replacement player over a full season. This does not mean that the player only contributes to 6-7 victories. Rather, it states that all of the player’s contributions add up to 6 or 7 full victories that can be credited to the player (relative to a replacement player baseline). Being that none of the Sox players missed the entire season and that their replacements played above “replacement level,” it seems logical that the injuries cost the Sox fewer wins than you might think if you were, say, an overnight host for WEEI (who stated that the Red Sox lost 10+ games in the standings due to injuries and would be way out in front without them). The injuries have killed Boston, and they would absolutely be more involved in the race if they had remained healthy. But they would likely still be on the outside looking in at the start of September even without their incredible spate of injuries.

Aug 312010

One of the frequent cautions we hear when the Yankees bring in a left handed hitter is brought to the Yankees is that he will get pull happy playing in Yankee Stadium. I can’t recall if this was exactly the case with Curtis Granderson, but I’m sure at least a few people brought it up. Let’s see what we can dig up in the Spray Charts.

Here’s Curtis’s spray chart from 2009. Obviously, this has a bigger sample because it encompasses a full season without time surrendered to the disabled list.

CG 2009 Spray Chart

There, we see a fair amount of hits to left and center field, but most of the hits seem to be concentrated to the right side of the field. Via FanGraphs, let’s look at his splits in terms of hit direction. In 2009, Granderson had a total of 157 hits. 19 went to left (12.1%), 39 to center (24.84), and 99 to right (63.06). We can see that a pretty wide majority of of Granderson’s hits landed in right in 2009. Let’s check out 2010.

CG 2010 Spray Chart

Just at first glance, the hits look a little more evenly spread. And, lately, we’ve been seeing Granderson drive the ball to the opposite field more, mostly after his work with Kevin Long. Thus far, Curtis has 82 his on the season. Nine to left (10.98%), 28 to center (34.15), and 51 to right field (32.48). So, it would appear that Granderson has not been pull happy at all and has adjusted his game to go back up the middle and the other way a little more.

How has this happened? Let’s look at the pitches Curtis has swung at to determine this. 2009 will be first with 2010 to follow.

The latter chart is less cluttered because of a shorter time frame/smaller sample size, but we can see that it appears Curtis is seeing fewer pitches on the inner part of the plate. As good hitters do, Granderson is taking what’s given to him and hitting the ball to left and center.

So, no, Curtis Granderson has not gotten pull happy since joining the Yankees. Instead, he’s adjusted his approach based on the pitches he’s seen–and his struggles in the middle of the season–to become a more “widespread,” so to speak, hitter.

Aug 312010

Those who watch Yankees games on YES know that Michael Kay will often mention Homer Bush’s role on the 1998 Yankees whenever discussing how important good baserunning and stolen bases are, particularly from bench players. He tends to pontificate on the topic for a while, suggesting Bush was the consummate bench player and was a key cog on the 1998 Yankees. Yet a close look at the numbers suggest that Kay is misremembering the importance of Homer Bush.

Bush did hit well in his limited appearances, with a gaudy .380/.421/.465 line. However, despite being with the team all year, those numbers came in just 78 plate appearances, and he had just 4 extra base hits and 5 RBI on the season. More importantly, his baserunning was adequate at best. He was just one run better than average as a baserunner in 1998, and had just 6 stolen bases to go with 3 CS’s. In total, he was worth 0.8 wins above replacement over the regular season. The postseason was even less eventful. Over 3 series, he had no at-bats, stole 2 bases, and scored one run. In all, he had a limited impact on the basepaths, in the field, and although he performed well when given a chance, at the plate as well.

The next time Michael Kay brings up Homer Bush’s stellar 1998 season on the basepaths, just tune him out. Bush was an adequate bench piece, and nothing more.

Aug 312010

While driving home from my first class of the Fall Semester last night, I listened to part of the game on the radio. As I passed Exit 19 on the southbound, Ramiro Pena knocked in Jorge Posada to give the Yankees six runs. Right before he did that, everyone’s favorite radio whipping boy and whipping girl, John Sterling and Suyzn Waldman, made a comment saying that both Pena and Francisco Cervelli became better hitters when the situation called for it. Of course, the term they used was “situational hitting.” Since I’m always curious, I made a mental note to check that idea when I got home. So, let’s see what I found.

Let’s start with Cervelli. Going into last night, Cervelli had a WPA of -1.57 (-4.99 -WPA + 3.43 +WPA) so we’re already seeing that, generally, Cervelli doesn’t do much at the plate to advance the Yankee winning cause. But, let’s be nice, that covers all situations, not just the situations we want to look at. After viewing the WPA number, we look over at the “clutch” number which FanGraphs defines as “how much worse or better a player does in high leverage situations than he would’ve done in context neutral situations. Frankie’s clutch score is -0.35. Okay, maybe John and Suyzn weren’t right here. Let’s keep digging and look at some of his splits.

With the bases empty, Cervelli has a .628 OPS. With men on, he’s got a .645 OPS. So, maybe there is something to this. And, with runners in scoring position, Frankie has a .741 OPS (all three of those per Baseball-Reference). Hey, look at that. Maybe his situational hitting is better than I’m giving him credit for. Still, that doesn’t tell the whole story. Those situations aren’t always the biggest situations of the game. In high leverage situations, Cervelli has a pathetic .327 OPS and a .153 (!!!!!) wOBA (both of those per FanGraphs). Yeah, John and Suyzn, you struck out here. Francisco Cervelli is not a good hitter and is not a good situational hitter.

Let’s try this experiment for Pena, numbers only.

WPA: -0.13 (-1.88, +1.75)
Clutch: 0.66
Empty: .480
Men on: .512
RISP: .434
High Leverage (OPS/wOBA): .571/.326

So it looks like there may be a little something to this with Pena. Now, with a .326 wOBA in high leverage situation, it’s not exactly like the dude is lighting the world on fire when it counts, but he is doing something better than his normal season (.236 wOBA).

John, Suyzn, you were halfish right.

Javier Vazquez looked incredibly sharp in last night’s relief appearance, going 4.2 innings while allowing one run on two hits and 6 strikeouts. He looked sharper than he had since August started, and credited the change to a mechanical tweak made by Dave Eiland:

There is a slight mechanical adjustment that seems to be helping Vazquez’s fastball. When he lifts his left leg in his delivery, Vazquez is bringing the leg farther back. It’s not more of a twist, he said, and the leg’s not coming up any higher, it’s just coming a little farther back toward second base.

“The arm angle also has to play a part of it, but (pitching coach Dave Eiland) feels like that’s going to give me better momentum, and it has,” Vazquez said. “The ball was true to where I wanted it to be.”

The mechanical change had tangible results, as Javy’s stuff was noticeably sharper than it had been in recent weeks. Unlike Javy’s starts in August, during which he was battling a dead arm and averaged 88 MPH on his fastball, Javy was close to 90 MPH (89.37) with his fastball. He threw 30 four seamers, including 19 for strikes with 3 swinging strikes, and 6 two seamers which netted 5 strikes. His breaking stuff was even better, as he threw 7 of his 10 changeups for strikes (2 swinging), 13 of his 17 curveballs for strikes (3 swinging), and 2 of his 3 sliders for swinging strikes. He had swing and miss stuff last night, as he got 10 swinging strikes among his 66 pitches (15.1%).

The question is, what is the next step with Javy? I have seen some people state that the team should take it slow with him and let him work in the bullpen for a bit longer to make sure he is equipped to start again. I disagree, and feel that he should take Dustin Moseley’s next turn. Javy was excellent from the middle of May through July, a stretch that constituted the bulk of his season. He lost his starting spot due to a dead arm that resulted in 4 atrocious starts, rather than due to an extended period of ineffectiveness. Now that his velocity is back up and his breaking stuff looks sharper, I see no reason to believe that Dustin Moseley will be the more effective starter going forward.

© 2011 TYU Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha