IMPORTANT BLOG ANNOUNCEMENT

PLEASE CHANGE YOUR BOOKMARKS AND FEEDS TO THE NEW URL, YANKEEANALYSTS.COM. TYU IS IN NO WAY AFFILIATED WITH THE NEW YORK YANKEES OR YANKEES UNIVERSE.

An interesting post from Dan Szymborski of Baseball Think Factory renown over at ESPN:

What would this AL East race look like if the Sox had stayed healthy?

….For those five starters, there were a combined 996 missed plate appearances compared to what would be expected.

Those 996 plate appearances had to go somewhere, so to do the next phase of this projection, I had to take them back from the guys who got them. I tried to be as fair as I could — Daniel Nava and Ryan Kalish lost the most, as did players like Bill Hall.

Then I used runs created, a Bill James stat. I created an estimate of how many runs the replacements created in those 996 plate appearances — and how many the injured players would have likely created. For the injured players, I used their preseason ZiPS projections as a guide to how they likely would have played, given their normal playing time.

The five injured starters would have created 153 runs; the replacements created 114. That’s a difference of 39 runs, which equates to roughly four wins.

If you look at the AL East standings, that makes the Red Sox a 78-53 team as opposed to their current status as a 74-57 team; they’d be three games back of the New York Yankees and Tampa Bay Rays, as opposed to their current seven games back.

I did not want to reproduce the entire article, and was forced to snip out some of the analysis. I highly recommend reading the original article to make sure you capture the context of his calculations.

Dan’s conclusion seems about right. One thing that the saber revolution has taught us is that even the greatest players tend to be worth only 6-7 wins more than a replacement player over a full season. This does not mean that the player only contributes to 6-7 victories. Rather, it states that all of the player’s contributions add up to 6 or 7 full victories that can be credited to the player (relative to a replacement player baseline). Being that none of the Sox players missed the entire season and that their replacements played above “replacement level,” it seems logical that the injuries cost the Sox fewer wins than you might think if you were, say, an overnight host for WEEI (who stated that the Red Sox lost 10+ games in the standings due to injuries and would be way out in front without them). The injuries have killed Boston, and they would absolutely be more involved in the race if they had remained healthy. But they would likely still be on the outside looking in at the start of September even without their incredible spate of injuries.

Aug 312010

One of the frequent cautions we hear when the Yankees bring in a left handed hitter is brought to the Yankees is that he will get pull happy playing in Yankee Stadium. I can’t recall if this was exactly the case with Curtis Granderson, but I’m sure at least a few people brought it up. Let’s see what we can dig up in the Spray Charts.

Here’s Curtis’s spray chart from 2009. Obviously, this has a bigger sample because it encompasses a full season without time surrendered to the disabled list.

CG 2009 Spray Chart

There, we see a fair amount of hits to left and center field, but most of the hits seem to be concentrated to the right side of the field. Via FanGraphs, let’s look at his splits in terms of hit direction. In 2009, Granderson had a total of 157 hits. 19 went to left (12.1%), 39 to center (24.84), and 99 to right (63.06). We can see that a pretty wide majority of of Granderson’s hits landed in right in 2009. Let’s check out 2010.

CG 2010 Spray Chart

Just at first glance, the hits look a little more evenly spread. And, lately, we’ve been seeing Granderson drive the ball to the opposite field more, mostly after his work with Kevin Long. Thus far, Curtis has 82 his on the season. Nine to left (10.98%), 28 to center (34.15), and 51 to right field (32.48). So, it would appear that Granderson has not been pull happy at all and has adjusted his game to go back up the middle and the other way a little more.

How has this happened? Let’s look at the pitches Curtis has swung at to determine this. 2009 will be first with 2010 to follow.

The latter chart is less cluttered because of a shorter time frame/smaller sample size, but we can see that it appears Curtis is seeing fewer pitches on the inner part of the plate. As good hitters do, Granderson is taking what’s given to him and hitting the ball to left and center.

So, no, Curtis Granderson has not gotten pull happy since joining the Yankees. Instead, he’s adjusted his approach based on the pitches he’s seen–and his struggles in the middle of the season–to become a more “widespread,” so to speak, hitter.

Aug 312010

Those who watch Yankees games on YES know that Michael Kay will often mention Homer Bush’s role on the 1998 Yankees whenever discussing how important good baserunning and stolen bases are, particularly from bench players. He tends to pontificate on the topic for a while, suggesting Bush was the consummate bench player and was a key cog on the 1998 Yankees. Yet a close look at the numbers suggest that Kay is misremembering the importance of Homer Bush.

Bush did hit well in his limited appearances, with a gaudy .380/.421/.465 line. However, despite being with the team all year, those numbers came in just 78 plate appearances, and he had just 4 extra base hits and 5 RBI on the season. More importantly, his baserunning was adequate at best. He was just one run better than average as a baserunner in 1998, and had just 6 stolen bases to go with 3 CS’s. In total, he was worth 0.8 wins above replacement over the regular season. The postseason was even less eventful. Over 3 series, he had no at-bats, stole 2 bases, and scored one run. In all, he had a limited impact on the basepaths, in the field, and although he performed well when given a chance, at the plate as well.

The next time Michael Kay brings up Homer Bush’s stellar 1998 season on the basepaths, just tune him out. Bush was an adequate bench piece, and nothing more.

Aug 312010

While driving home from my first class of the Fall Semester last night, I listened to part of the game on the radio. As I passed Exit 19 on the southbound, Ramiro Pena knocked in Jorge Posada to give the Yankees six runs. Right before he did that, everyone’s favorite radio whipping boy and whipping girl, John Sterling and Suyzn Waldman, made a comment saying that both Pena and Francisco Cervelli became better hitters when the situation called for it. Of course, the term they used was “situational hitting.” Since I’m always curious, I made a mental note to check that idea when I got home. So, let’s see what I found.

Let’s start with Cervelli. Going into last night, Cervelli had a WPA of -1.57 (-4.99 -WPA + 3.43 +WPA) so we’re already seeing that, generally, Cervelli doesn’t do much at the plate to advance the Yankee winning cause. But, let’s be nice, that covers all situations, not just the situations we want to look at. After viewing the WPA number, we look over at the “clutch” number which FanGraphs defines as “how much worse or better a player does in high leverage situations than he would’ve done in context neutral situations. Frankie’s clutch score is -0.35. Okay, maybe John and Suyzn weren’t right here. Let’s keep digging and look at some of his splits.

With the bases empty, Cervelli has a .628 OPS. With men on, he’s got a .645 OPS. So, maybe there is something to this. And, with runners in scoring position, Frankie has a .741 OPS (all three of those per Baseball-Reference). Hey, look at that. Maybe his situational hitting is better than I’m giving him credit for. Still, that doesn’t tell the whole story. Those situations aren’t always the biggest situations of the game. In high leverage situations, Cervelli has a pathetic .327 OPS and a .153 (!!!!!) wOBA (both of those per FanGraphs). Yeah, John and Suyzn, you struck out here. Francisco Cervelli is not a good hitter and is not a good situational hitter.

Let’s try this experiment for Pena, numbers only.

WPA: -0.13 (-1.88, +1.75)
Clutch: 0.66
Empty: .480
Men on: .512
RISP: .434
High Leverage (OPS/wOBA): .571/.326

So it looks like there may be a little something to this with Pena. Now, with a .326 wOBA in high leverage situation, it’s not exactly like the dude is lighting the world on fire when it counts, but he is doing something better than his normal season (.236 wOBA).

John, Suyzn, you were halfish right.

Javier Vazquez looked incredibly sharp in last night’s relief appearance, going 4.2 innings while allowing one run on two hits and 6 strikeouts. He looked sharper than he had since August started, and credited the change to a mechanical tweak made by Dave Eiland:

There is a slight mechanical adjustment that seems to be helping Vazquez’s fastball. When he lifts his left leg in his delivery, Vazquez is bringing the leg farther back. It’s not more of a twist, he said, and the leg’s not coming up any higher, it’s just coming a little farther back toward second base.

“The arm angle also has to play a part of it, but (pitching coach Dave Eiland) feels like that’s going to give me better momentum, and it has,” Vazquez said. “The ball was true to where I wanted it to be.”

The mechanical change had tangible results, as Javy’s stuff was noticeably sharper than it had been in recent weeks. Unlike Javy’s starts in August, during which he was battling a dead arm and averaged 88 MPH on his fastball, Javy was close to 90 MPH (89.37) with his fastball. He threw 30 four seamers, including 19 for strikes with 3 swinging strikes, and 6 two seamers which netted 5 strikes. His breaking stuff was even better, as he threw 7 of his 10 changeups for strikes (2 swinging), 13 of his 17 curveballs for strikes (3 swinging), and 2 of his 3 sliders for swinging strikes. He had swing and miss stuff last night, as he got 10 swinging strikes among his 66 pitches (15.1%).

The question is, what is the next step with Javy? I have seen some people state that the team should take it slow with him and let him work in the bullpen for a bit longer to make sure he is equipped to start again. I disagree, and feel that he should take Dustin Moseley’s next turn. Javy was excellent from the middle of May through July, a stretch that constituted the bulk of his season. He lost his starting spot due to a dead arm that resulted in 4 atrocious starts, rather than due to an extended period of ineffectiveness. Now that his velocity is back up and his breaking stuff looks sharper, I see no reason to believe that Dustin Moseley will be the more effective starter going forward.

Aug 302010

After finishing off a series win against the Chicago White Sox at US Cellular Field, the Yankees traveled home last night to prepare for a homestand beginning this evening.  First, the club will take on Oakland in a four-game series.  The pitching matchups are as follows:

Monday, 7 pm EST – Trevor Cahill v. Dustin Moseley.  Cahill is the anomaly of the year with a .217 BABIP and a FIP almost a run and a half lower than his ERA this year.  Dave Cameron outlined the issues surrounding his BABIP at Fangraphs a week ago, and it’s worth a read.  The short version is that Cahill is probably throwing pitches that are harder to hit, but is almost certainly getting good fortune on balls in play.

Tuesday, 7 pm EST – Vin Mazzaro v. Phil Hughes. This will be Hughes’ 25th start of the season, and a six inning start would put him at the 150 inning mark.  He’ll be opposed by New Jersey native Vin Mazzaro, who has been similar to Cahill in terms of balls in play this season.

Wednesday, 7 pm EST – Brett Anderson v. AJ Burnett.  Anderson has been plagued by injury all season, but has been mostly effective whenever he manages to take the mound.  This game will be the last night game the team will play until the following Tuesday, which is annoying for those of us with day jobs.

Thursday, 1 pm EST – Dallas Braden of Bradenia v. CC Sabathia.  Unfortunately, Alex Rodriguez will not be active for this game to face Braden.  As of now there is no word as to whether another Yankee will attempt to breach the sovereignty of Braden’s mound.

While the Yankees are facing the Athletics, the Rays will host Toronto for a three game set.  The Blue Jays will follow this by coming to New York for a three-game weekend set.

Friday, 1 pm EST – Brandon Morrow v. Ivan Nova.  The Jays have announced that this will be the last start of the year for Morrow.  Given the way he pitched against the Yankees in his last outing, it’s unfortunate that they didn’t decide to shut him down sooner.

Saturday, 1 pm EST – Mark Rzepczynski v. Dustin Moseley.  The Yankees bludgeoned Rzepczynski last time around, and Moseley was able to keep the Jays largely off-balance.

Sunday, 1 pm EST – Ricky Romero v. Phil Hughes.  This will be the fourth time the Yankees will face Romero this season.  In two of those outings he shut the Yankees down; on July 3rd he was rocked for eight earned runs over 2 innings.  Hopefully familiarity will enable the Yankees to stake Hughes to an early lead.

During this series, the Rays begin a road trip by traveling to Baltimore for a three-game set.  That Monday, they begin a three-game series in Boston. During that time, the Yankees will host the Orioles for the final three games of the homestand.

Monday, 1 pm EST – AJ Burnett v. Jake Arrieta.  The Yankees could shuffle the rotation at some point, deciding to reinsert Javier Vazquez back into the rotation or move Burnett back to give him extra rest.  At this point, however, he is on track to face Oakland and then Baltimore.

Tuesday, 7 pm EST – CC Sabathia v. Brad Bergensen. This is another favorable pitching matchup for the Yankees.  Bergensen has a 5.55 ERA and a 1.49 WHIP in 131 innings this season.

Wednesday, 1 pm EST – Ivan Nova v. Kevin Millwood.  The final game of the homestand is another day game, the sixth one out of ten.  Millwood has been ineffective this season, so this is another good opportunity for the Yankees to extend their division advantage.

Now, the Yankees could shuffle the rotation at any point.  Dustin Moseley and Ivan Nova could both be bumped when Pettitte returns or when they decide to give Vazquez another turn.  Additionally, the team could always decide to move Burnett’s start back.  Despite that, the Yankees have a fantastic opportunity over the next ten games.  They will travel to Tampa, Texas and then Baltimore before returning home to host the Rays and the Red Sox.  They finish the regular season in Toronto and Boston.  Meanwhile, the Rays finish the season with Seattle, Baltimore and Kansas City.  At the end of the day, all that matters is getting into the playoffs.  Yet if the club has designs on winning the American League East and securing home field advantage throughout the ALDS and ALCS, then the next ten games will be crucial.  On paper, it will not be any easier for the Yankees until October is over. Hopefully they beat up on the dregs of the American League so that the final week of the season is free of drama and full of AAA players getting playing time.

With September fast approaching and the Yankees 6.5 games clear of the Red Sox in the Wild Card race, I thought it would be interesting to try and figure out what the playoff roster might look like if the Yankees hold on to a postseason spot. With some injuries and strong performances from young players muddying the waters, it is likely that I will be wrong, but hopefully we can come close to estimating the actual roster.

Here are the locks:

Position Players (12)
Jorge Posada
Francisco Cervelli
Mark Teixeira
Lance Berkman
Robinson Cano
Derek Jeter
Alex Rodriguez
Brett Gardner
Curtis Granderson
Nick Swisher
Marcus Thames
Austin Kearns

Pitchers (8)
CC Sabathia
Andy Pettitte
Phil Hughes
Mariano Rivera
Joba Chamberlain
David Robertson
Boone Logan
Kerry Wood

That leaves 5 remaining spots, with only a utility infielder, a 4th starter, and a long man being necessities. AJ Burnett and Javier Vazquez are likely the only candidates for the starting spot, although I guess it is possible for Nova to swipe it if both veterans continue to pitch terribly and he sustains his strong start. As for the utility role, that will likely be between Eduardo Nunez and Ramiro Pena, with Pena the favorite for the role due to his longer tenure and superior glove. The long-man role is more complicated, in that Nova, Alfredo Aceves, and Dustin Moseley are all legitimate options for that role.

Here is my final 5:

Ramiro Pena
Chad Moeller
AJ Burnett
Ivan Nova
Damaso Marte

I chose Pena over Nunez because of his superior defense. The only context in which I could see him entering a game is as a runner or defensive replacement, and I do not see a measurable difference between the two as runners. Pena is the better defender at both short and third, so he gets the nod.

I selected Burnett as the 4th starter simply because I think he is the most likely to be handed the job if he shows even a bit of improvement during September. Shockingly, this leaves Javy Vazquez on the outside looking in, although a poor Burnett start in Round 1 could result in Javy being given a shot should the Yanks reach the ALCS.

As for Chad Moeller, his inclusion is the result of Frankie Cervelli’s status as the occasional starting catcher. If Cervelli starts any of the games while Jorge is the DH, the Yankees need to be able to pinch hit for Frankie without losing the DH. The only way to do so is to carry a third catcher, so Moeller makes the team. However, if Lance Berkman has a strong September, you might see him DH in the games that Cervelli starts, in which case Moeller is superfluous and a pinch runner such as Greg Golson would take the final position player slot.

The last two bullpen spots are wide open, with Aceves the most likely among those who I have excluded to work his way onto the roster. However, with the uncertain nature of his recovery, I am loathe to include him at this point. I like Nova as the long man, because he has the sort of stuff that allows Joe Girardi to use him as a short reliever as well, if necessary. Finally, we know how much Joe loves matchups, so if Marte is healthy and is even slightly effective in September, he has a great shot of making the team.

What would your roster look like?

I hope that everyone had as amazing a summer as I did. I love the outdoors, and couldn’t think of a better way to spend the season than out in the woods. One of the downsides of being in the woods is that I don’t have much baseball information, especially minor league information, coming my way. And boy, did I miss a lot.

The past three months may have been the best half-season ever for the Yankees minor league system. Good news proliferated through a system that needed some good news pretty badly around the time I had left. It came in leaps and bounds up and down throughout the system.

1. Jesus Montero can hit again

Jesus Montero did not have a good introduction to Triple-A. He hit .247/.313/.384 in April and an even worse .214/.302/.333 in May. His name began to surface in trade rumors. Plans to DH/C him in the majors in 2011 looked thin. But Montero, just 20 years old, responded with his best-hitting half season ever. Since the Triple-A All-Star break, the Venezuelan has hit .363/.417/.689. Montero has never before demonstrated the kind of game-changing, 40 home run power that he showed in batting practice until now. He’s been a great line drive, for-average hitter, but the power is finally coming along. And its a beautiful thing to see.

2. Manuel Banuelos loses appendix, gains 5 mph on his fastball

At the start of the season, I wrote the following about Banuelos:

Manny Banuelos has a little more experience. He pitched a full season of 109 innings at low-A ball last year, and is a year younger than Ramirez. His rate stats are better too – 8.7 K/9 and 2.3 BB/9. Banuelos is a lefty with solid enough stuff – a fastball topping out at about 90 and average secondary pitches. He’s undersized at 5′10″. Banuelos draws huge praise for poise, character, and command on the mound. His average Yankee prospect list rating was #4. I rated him #9.

Before this season, Banuelos was an undersized lefty with average stuff, but drew great praise for the mental and mechanical side of the game. I questioned the ceiling of a young, small lefty with a 90 mph fastball.  Things have definitely changed.

Banuelos returned from his appendectomy with, as Eric linked to a week ago, “prime Josh Beckett stuff” to go with the poise, character, and command of a MLB pitcher. To quote Frank Piliere,

This is where Banuelos’ game has changed the most since the 2009 season. Last season, I had him sitting 90-92 with the fastball, touching 93. In his most recent outing, he sat 93-94 mph, never dipping below 92, and routinely hit 95-96 mph. Banuelos even touched 97 on a couple occasions. At that level of velocity, he has a true plus fastball, particularly for a left-hander.

He showed good life down in the zone with his fastball, and had only one of his fastballs turned on with any authority all night. In other words, the velocity was playing well and continued to produce late swings and swings and misses. Considering his age, Banuelos showed well-above-average fastball command, but will have to work on his feel for the inside part of the plate against righty hitters. He got somewhat predictable, working on the outer third and allowing hitters to dive out over the plate. And, in general, although you have to love his outstanding aggressiveness and strike-throwing nature, he proved to be a bit reckless with his location in the zone at times.

This is one of those holy-crap revelations that completely changes the ballgame for Manuel Banuelos. He will instantly be vaulted to the #2 prospect in the Yankee system, and probably a top-50 prospect in baseball. He’s got all the stuff to be a true ace in the majors, and his Double-A promotion after a significantly shortened season shows how much confidence the team has in him again. Workload and size will continue to be a concern, but Banuelos just blew the ceiling off potential.

Continue reading »

Aug 302010

Happy Monday, all. If you’re reading this before 3 PM, I’m stuck in “professional development” for middle school English teachers, even though I’m not technically a teacher. Such is life. Anyway, here’s what was running through my head during the weekend.

Friday night’s game was just embarrassing to watch. I’ve umpired Cal Ripken League games that were cleaner than that “game.” That’s back to back ugly starts on Friday nights for Burnett, and he’s starting to get me concerned. Obviously, he can turn it on at any time and has done so this year (six starts of at least five innings with zero earned runs allowed), but I’m not gonna hold my breath. It looks as if that sharp drop in strikeout rate is biting A.J. now in the second half. “At least CC is starting tomorrow,” I said to my girlfriend before we fell asleep.

Then CC started on Saturday night and it frankly wasn’t great. He didn’t pitch horribly, but he was getting hit hard and gave up two homers. There’s literally no way any of us can or should be mad at CC. He was straight beasting the league. Before that start, CC hadn’t allowed more than three earned runs in a game since was on May 29th. From the start after that, June 3rd, to August 22nd, CC threw 116.1 innings to a 2.32 ERA and a .630 OPSA. Chances are Saturday was just a bump in the road. Speaking of hitting well…

How about this Marcus Thames guy? Remember when I said it was silly to bring him on the team and they should’ve kept Rule V pick Jamie Hoffmann since he could actually play an outfield position? Yeah, I was way wrong on that. Keep on doing your thing, Marcus. I’m glad he’s been able to hit righties just as well as lefties this year, though I don’t expect that to keep up. Whatever, I’ll take it.

Another solid start for Ivan Nova, this one with more strikeouts. That wasn’t exactly something he did much in the minors, so I won’t expect that to keep up. But, Ivan, if you want to keep striking guys out, go right on ahead.

The Yankees will draw Trevor Cahill against Oakland tomorrow night at home, while Dustin Moseley goes for the home team. Cahill’s quietly put together a good season. His 2.43 ERA is sparkling, but his 4.03 FIP and 4.12 xFIP show that he may not be doing as well as his ERA shows. But, at the end of the day, the runs aren’t crossing the plate against Trevor Cahill.

I’m gonna list some stats for two players. One is considered a borderline Hall of Famer by many, the other is an afterthought for most. They both played the same position. Guess who’s who. If you were following me on Twitter last night, don’t ruin the surprise. KEY: bWAR = WAR on Baseball-Reference

Player One: .295/.398/.465/.863, 128 OPS+, .376 wOBA, 3.34 bWAR/season
Player Two: .307/.358/.471/.840, 127 OPS+, .361 wOBA, 2.84 bWAR/season

Congrats to Japan for winning the Little League World Series. It’s always cool to see the little kids play, especially since I occasionally umpire for that age group (though a different league and different rules).

Lastly, how odd was that Red Sox/Rays series for us as Yankee fans? I mean, either way, the Yankees saw some benefit. If the Red Sox won games, it would give the Yankees space against the Rays. If the Rays won, it would move the Sox closer to elimination, and how awesome is it when that happens?

Over the last few days, while the Red Sox and Rays battled in Tampa, Yankee fans grappled with an interesting dilemma. With the Yankees tied for first place with Tampa and with Boston attempting to make it a 3 team race for two playoff spots, fans of the Bombers were unsure of who to root for. Most of the opinions that I heard on the matter fell into one of three camps:

Rooting for the Rays: Those rooting for the Rays felt that although the Rays were much closer to the Yankees in the standings, the Red Sox posed a more dire threat. Falling behind the Rays would cost the Yankees a home playoff game or two, while falling behind Boston would likely mean that the Yankees miss the playoffs. Additionally, many found it impossible to root for the hated Red Sox, while few felt as strongly about the Rays.

Rooting for the Red Sox: Those hoping for a series victory from Boston felt that Boston was buried enough in the standings to make the Rays the more relevant “opponent.” The Yankees are tied with the Rays and have a more difficult schedule going forward, so these folks wanted the Red Sox to help the Yankees take the division.

Rooting for 20 inning games: The last group could not find it within them to root for either club, and instead wanted long games that took a lot out of both teams. The outcome was irrelevant as long as both teams were decimated by fatigue.

I found myself in the first group, as I worried first about getting into the playoffs. We can deal with Tampa in September.

What was your take on the Tampa-Boston series?

© 2011 TYU Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha