IMPORTANT BLOG ANNOUNCEMENT

PLEASE CHANGE YOUR BOOKMARKS AND FEEDS TO THE NEW URL, YANKEEANALYSTS.COM. TYU IS IN NO WAY AFFILIATED WITH THE NEW YORK YANKEES OR YANKEES UNIVERSE.

The non-waiver deadline is a mere eleven days away, so let’s look into some potential trades the Yankees could make.

The Yanks, and the Sox, are apparently interested in Toronto RP Scott Downs. In his age 34 season, Downs is having a great year. His ERA is below three and his FIP is 3.09, while his xFIP is at 3.51. His career platoon splits aren’t bad either, with a 3.25 xFIP against LHB and a 3.95 xFIP vs. RHB. He’d be a nice get for the Yanks, and he projects to be a type-A so the Yankees could get a draft pick for him (though that’s unlikely).

Other teams are apparently interested in Francisco Cervelli. If this is true, the Yankees should listen long and hard. It’s likely that Cervelli’s already hit his ceiling and if the Yankees can turn him into anything, it’d be a good trade. But, there is something valuable about him. He’s a cheap back up catcher and likely will be with the Yankees until he starts getting too expensive (like Melky Cabrera); that is, he’s a fine piece to have, but once he starts making seven figures through arbitration raises, he’s gone.

Like always, the Yankees are making the bench and the bullpen the focus of trading season. I’d like the Yankees to work out the ‘pen from within, though it will be hard with the injuries to Damaso Marte and Andy Pettitte. This should open the door to guys like Romulo Sanchez and Jonathan Albaladejo, though. The post lists guys that the Yankees’ve been linked to, but none of them are too exciting due to either inconsistency or price issues.

As for the bench, that’s something the Yankees will likely have to look outside the organization for. Ramiro Pena is an automatic out and Colin Curtis hasn’t lit the world on fire, either, so another bench player would be helpful.

Finally, the Yankees are not very willing to move Jesus Montero. They used him as bait for Cliff Lee because it’s such a special case but he, wisely, will not be moved for any of the players on the market.

Like 2009, I don’t think there will be much of a splash from the Yankees at the trade deadline. If a move is made, it will be something small like a bench player. I’d love for the Yankees to get Adam Dunn or another big bat for a full time DH, I doubt that’s going to happen. And though there’s not much time, I’d like to see the internal bullpen options get a shot before a trade is made. If that takes too long, though, there is always the possibility of a waiver trade for a reliever.

Let’s get this out of the way: I vehemently dislike Sergio Mitre. If you’ve followed me here from BBD or seen me comment over at RAB, my contempt for Mitre is pretty easy to see. Perhaps this is unfair because I’m influenced by his relatively poor showing last year that came after Tommy John Surgery. However, there’s just not a lot that impresses me about this guy.

His sinker is solid, though, and his near 60% ground ball rate is desirable, but that’s his only positive attribute. He doesn’t miss many bats (5.46 K/9), has good-not-great-control (3.02 BB/9), and gives up pretty solid contact (.325 BABIP).

This season, though, Mitre appeared–at least on the surface–to put it together. In a very small sample of 25 innings, Mitre posted a 2.88 ERA while stranding 78% of runners. This all seems well and good, but we need to look a little bit closer.

His FIP is a hefty 4.68 and his xFIP isn’t much better at 4.59. His groundball rate is down 8.5% from last year and is 9.9% down from his career rate. His strikeout rate is still iffy at 5.46 and his walk rate is up to 3.24, up both from last year and his career. His LOB% of 78 is also 12% over his career norm. In other words, it’s a big fat outlier.

So how was Mitre able to have such a good ERA despite iffy peripherals? His BABIP in 2010 was a ridiculously, horribly, unsustainably low .190. And, despite a big uptick in FB% (38.0 in ’10, 24.5 career), his HR/FB is down to 11.1% (14.4% career). The more innings that Mitre gets, the more those numbers are likely to go back up and his ERA will regress to the mean rather quickly.

I’m just not confident in Mitre over more than the occasional spot start. There aren’t, however, many alternatives. A trade would be ill advised since Pettitte will likely be out only a month and the internal options aren’t much better. Chad Gaudin hasn’t earned a start, neither has minor leaguer Zach McAllister. If Mitre stumbles, as I think he will, after one or two starts, I think the Yankees should recall Ivan Nova and see what happens. Again, it’s not ideal but I just have zero faith in Sergio Mitre.

Photo courtesy of the MLB.com

By now you’ve probably heard of Tim McCarver’s comments on the FOX Saturday broadcast, where he compared the Yankee front office to the Nazi and Communist regimes. If not, here it is again (video):

You remember some of those despotic leaders in World War II, primarily in Russia and Germany, where they used to take those pictures that they had … taken of former generals who were no longer alive, they had shot ‘em. They would airbrush the pictures, and airbrushed the generals out of the pictures. In a sense, that’s what the Yankees have done with Joe Torre. They have airbrushed his legacy. I mean, there’s no sign of Joe Torre at the stadium. And, that’s ridiculous. I don’t understand it.

The New York Time Bats blog has a follow up to the story, where Timmy backtracks a tiny bit.

McCarver, a close friend of Torre’s, said Monday in an interview from Florida that his analogies between the Yankees and the Third Reich and Stalin’s Soviet Union were “inappropriate.” But he added, “In my opinion, the underlying point here remains true: Yankees management has erased Joe Torre from their history.” He said, “I don’t think the Yankees have embraced the image of Joe Torre.”

McCarver said he had seen the photographs of Torre that hang at the new stadium but that he did not believe the team does enough to honor Torre’s integral role in leading the Yankees to four World Series championships. “Retiring his number would mean embracing his legacy,” he said.

Jason Zillo, the Yankees’ director of media relations, called the Fox truck on Saturday to complain about McCarver’s comments. In a statement issued Monday, Fox Sports said that McCarver “regrets” using the World War II analogy and that it would take no action.

So until Torre has his number retired, Timmy won’t be happy. Gotcha. He might want to call his friend and ask him whose idea it was that he wouldn’t return to the stadium. If he had any intention of being fair he might ask himself how he would feel if he was Hal Stienbrenner, owned the Yanks and a former employee wrote a book saying some of the nasty things Torre did about his father, painting him as a bully and a buffoon, and Torre’s saying his experience with a father who beat his mother regularly prepared him for working with George. George was a man who, as we all know, was too addled by dementia to defend himself from Torre’s remarks at the time.

From Fox’s point of view, they might actually like the idea that Tim has stirred up a bit of controversy here. People may tune in the next time he does a Yankee game just to hear if he says something even dumber. For the rest of us, it just cements a suspicion Yankee fans have long had about Tim. That he’s still bitter about the way his (very short) tenure as Yankee analyst ended, that he’s always been someone who favors the National League style of the game, and that he is completely blind and one sided when it comes to Joe Torre. I’m not sure Tim has really been all that relevant for many years now, but this episode takes him from to obscurity to oblivion for me. I’ll never again get too worked up over anything he says from this point forward, since I know where it’s coming from.

© 2011 TYU Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha