IMPORTANT BLOG ANNOUNCEMENT

PLEASE CHANGE YOUR BOOKMARKS AND FEEDS TO THE NEW URL, YANKEEANALYSTS.COM. TYU IS IN NO WAY AFFILIATED WITH THE NEW YORK YANKEES OR YANKEES UNIVERSE.

Allow me to play captain obvious for a second: it’s never a good time for a player to get injured.

This, however, is a particularly bad time for Brett Gardner to suffer a setback, even if it is just a day-to-day injury.

In June, Gardner is hitting a ridiculous .383/.424/.533/1.006 with a fantastic wOBA. The year’s sixth month has seen Gardner put up highs just about every statistic so a bump in the road is clearly unwelcome.

Delving deeper into the splits, there’s one trend I like: Brett Gardner’s walk rate has been improving each month. It started off at a solid 9.5 in April, rose to double digits in May, and has gone all the way up to 12.5% so far in June. One of the most important aspects of Gardner’s game is his ability to get on base and prior to 2010, this was a question mark because of his lack of power and relative abundance of strikeouts. It’s worth noting that Gardner’s strikeout rate has been on the rise each month, but if he keeps the walk rate up, I’ll take it.

Speaking of power, Gardner’s IsoP, which is never going to be very high, has also climbed upwards since the beginning of the season. We likely won’t see any more power from Gardner going forward, but if he can keep that Iso above .100, I’ll be happy.

Let’s take a closer look at where Brett’s balls are falling when they dunk in for hits. June comes first:

As we can see, when Gardner goes oppo, good things happen. By that count, Gardner’s got 23 hits in June and more than half of them have gone to center or left field.

Looking at the season-wide chart below, we see a similar trend:

While the hits are more distributed, there’s still a decent concentration of hits to left field. As for Brett’s outs, both the June chart and the season chart show us a lot of outs in the infield. This likely comes from Gardner’s very downward-plane-swing that produces a lot of chops at the ball (his relative lack of hip movement could lead to this too). If there’s one thing that frustrates me about Gardner, it is his swing. I’ve commented on it before, but who am I to be complaining when it’s working for him?

With Gardner, I’ve always been cautiously optimistic. His swing and the holes in his game made him seem unlikely to have much success at the Major League level. At the same time, though, he’s shown the ability to adjust at each and every level and thus far, the majors have been no different. Brett has shown a ton of improvement this season and hopefully, he continues on this trend to be a solid ML player.

Photo Credit: Robert Occhialini, @bump on Twitter; Bump on Flickr.

Jun 292010

Those of you that follow me on Twitter know that I have recently been railing against the cloud of misinformation surrounding the impending NBA free agency season. On the same day, anonymous sources will be the basis for reports that have LeBron James going to Miami, Chicago, and New York. Conflicting reports continue to emerge, with “sources familiar with his thinking” and “people in the industry with knowledge of the situation” popping up everywhere. With the insanity reaching a fever pitch this week, ESPN ombudsman Don Ohlmeyer chimed in on the use of anonymous sources:

There is no question that some of America’s most important stories could never have been told without relying on sources who don’t want their names revealed: Watergate, the Pentagon Papers, Guantánamo, etc. In earlier times, unnamed sources were used judiciously and required corroboration. But in the current atmosphere of instantaneous information, it seems that caution too often can be thrown to the wind, along with the confidence of the audience…..

In theory, anonymous sources are a last resort. Reporters are challenged to get people to speak on the record, but sometimes that’s just not possible. If the source remains unnamed, it must be a trade-off for candor and quality of information. Of course, there are times when information a source ardently believes to be true … turns out to be false. That’s why independent corroboration by a reporter is key. Bad sourcing or lax oversight can result in the equivalent of a journalistic drive-by shooting, aided and abetted by information cloaked in a shroud of anonymity.

It can be difficult for the audience to determine whether information attributed to an unnamed source is reliable, simple rumor or totally untrue. An outrageous example of bad reporting was coverage of the Duke lacrosse team and allegations against several of its players in 2006. News organizations around the country quoted ever-present unnamed sources, public officials, court records, and each other for months, opining in synchronicity on what turned out to be a lie…..

There’s no question that anonymous sources lead journalists to valuable information and that their motives can be pure — to right an injustice, to call the public’s attention to outrageous behavior, to correct dangerous situations, to shine a light on corruption. And there’s also no question that sometimes, if the source is to avoid retribution, the only way this can be done is anonymously.

But they can also be used to further personal agendas that harm others, benefit the source and/or mislead the audience — agents attempting to create a bidding war for their clients, players attempting to undermine their coaches, disgruntled or former employees seeking revenge, conferences attempting to poach new members, rivals looking to denigrate one another, etc.

I recommend reading the entire post, as Ohlmeyer discusses in detail the mechanics of using anonymous sources in trade rumor columns. As the trade deadline approaches and rumors begin to float, you will hear from many unnamed sources who believe the Yankees are willing to give up Jesus Montero, or value Romine more than Jesus, or have made Joba Chamberlain available and Andrew Brackman untouchable. But, as Ohlmeyer states, it is important to note that these sources always have a reason for revealing this information.

Agents and team executives like to muddy the waters through the press, so that each side seems like they have multiple suitors and can walk away from the table if they so choose. This leads to hundreds of false rumors that often go uncorroborated by members of the press and then are regurgitated for our consumption. Because the agenda of the source is unknown to us, the validity of the statements that they make is questionable, and should be taken as such. If something that such a source says seems extremely unlikely or too good to be true, it likely is. Do not believe everything you read, and be skeptical of that which you hear until a source puts their name on it. Otherwise, you are likely to be chasing false rumors until the trade deadline passes.

So the Yankees-Dodgers series ended in style on Sunday night with a fantastic come from behind win but I wasn’t around to write about it, so I’m going to do it now.

Let’s start with Sunday. The ninth inning was definitely awesome to see. Maybe it was the heat, but I was feeling incredibly frustrated with the Yankees as my girlfriend and I watched and had almost resigned myself to a loss. I’m glad the Bombers restored my faith. On Robinson Cano, well, he’s just all sorts of fantastic. He’s tied for the WAR lead (4.5) with Justin Morneau and I get a giddy feeling watching him play.

Saturday…well, A.J.’s just lost right now. I don’t know what else they can do but send him out there every five days and hope he gets back on track.

Friday was pretty sweet, too. A-Rod homered and CC was CC. And while I generally get annoyed with the whole idea of bean-ball-wars, it was nice to see Sabathia plunk Padilla and stare him down. I could totally see CC jumping on that goomba looking mother fucker Mario style.

Anyway, onto the storylines, ’cause everyone loves a good narrative…

The whole A-Rod/Torre thing: While I would’ve liked to have seen Rodriguez give Torre the cold shoulder all weekend, but it was nice to see A-Rod take the high road and greet Torre.

As for facing Torre, I’d be lying if I didn’t say it felt good to see the Yankees take two of three from his team. I appreciate what Torre did for the Yankees, but I’m not going to line up for the Torre worship that usually takes place in the main stream media. I’ve always said the Yankees made Torre more than Torre made the Yankees. Both parties have culpability in the current fractured relationship, but I don’t see the cold war lasting forever. Before long, there will be a thawing.

© 2011 TYU Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha