IMPORTANT BLOG ANNOUNCEMENT

PLEASE CHANGE YOUR BOOKMARKS AND FEEDS TO THE NEW URL, YANKEEANALYSTS.COM. TYU IS IN NO WAY AFFILIATED WITH THE NEW YORK YANKEES OR YANKEES UNIVERSE.

One silly media narrative that I have always hated is the idea that inconsistent athletes struggle due to some sort of mental deficiency rather than a simple lack of talent. The issue came up this morning, when Joel Sherman stated the following in a column:

It was craft vs. daft. Moyer, the pitcher with the greatest ratio of least stuff to most savvy, discombobulated the Yankees without topping 81 mph. Burnett, the pitcher with the greatest ratio of most stuff to least savvy, single-handedly revived the reeling Phillies with a combination of inaccuracy, indifference and ineptness that would have made Oliver Perez proud….

Can you imagine if you could put Moyer’s brain in Burnett’s head? You would have fewer tattoos, a higher pitching IQ and an ace. Instead, Burnett is what he is: the Lamar Odom of baseball, a player who fails to maximize awesome skills due to a lack of concentration and daily conviction.

AJ Burnett’s struggles have nothing to do with a lack of conviction, effort, or concentration. They are attributable to a lack of skill.

Burnett has some of the best “stuff” in all of baseball, which leads people to believe that he is as skilled as some of the aces that grace the mound around baseball, such as Doc Halladay or Justin Verlander. Once one makes that assumption, it is easy to take the next logical step and believe that he simply does not try as hard as they do or focus as well as they do and therefore is not as successful. However, this house of cards is built upon a faulty foundation, as it ignores the fact that command and control are both physical skills of pitching.

Being able to locate the ball and throw strikes where you want them on a consistent basis requires incredible precision, something that AJ Burnett is simply not equipped for. He has trouble consistently repeating his delivery, not for a lack of trying but because it is quite difficult, particularly for a pitcher of his height and build, and he is not physically gifted enough to do so. While his stuff compares favorably to that of anybody in the game today, his subpar command and control and his limited repertoire mean that an off-day for even one of his pitches can lead to a difficult outing.

Even if Burnett does lose focus at times, his struggles have little to do with conviction. He can go to the mound with complete focus and want so very badly to throw strikes, yet some nights it will be to no avail. He has physical limitations that make him a solid #2 starter rather than an ace, and people need to stop psychoanalyzing him after every run of poor starts.

Jun 172010

Last night, Derek Jeter came up to the plate four times and did not reach base in any of those appearances. What seemed most frustrating was that he wasn’t working the count. Despite seeing six pitches in his last trip against Lidge, he still saw only eleven pitches all night (2.75 per PA).

Including last night’s game, Jeter is seeing 3.48 pitches per PA, which would be his lowest number since ESPN began tracking the stat in 2002. Derek’s overall swing% is up to 49.4, the highest since a mark just over 50% in 2004. When a guy has contact skills as refined as Jeter’s, you don’t mind when he swings…at good pitches. That seems to be a bit of a problem this year. Not including last night’s game, Jeter’s O-Swing% is still at a very high 29.3, almost ten points above his career average.

It looks as if this swing-more-often strategy isn’t going to change. I’ve beaten my head against a wall writing these posts about Jeter, hoping to see the trend reverse itself. If this is the way Jeter wants to go, that’s fine. He’s been hitting better of late and has a slightly improved walk rate recently. We should also note that Jeter’s BABIP is still much lower than his career mark (off by about 45 points) and it hasn’t been this low since 2004. If a correction is coming–which isn’t guaranteed due to a low line drive rate–more swings could lead to more hits.

Still, I can’t help but be frustrated with Jeter’s new found tendency to swing early. Maybe I shouldn’t hold my breath and expect him to switch his approach midway through the season, but if there’s a hitter talented enough to do it, it’s Derek.

Since the promotion of Ian Kennedy, Phil Hughes, and Joba Chamberlain, the Yankee pitching pipeline has been pretty mundane. We’ve seen a lot of low ceiling starting pitchers end up in the Pittsburgh rotation or surgeons table. I love David Phelps, I really do, but its hard to get really excited about him. Things are finally changing down in Tampa with Andrew Brackman, Graham Stoneburner, Adam Warren, and the return of Dellin Betances.

I knocked down Brackman’s prospect rating 9 spots just two weeks ago, and I may already be regretting losing faith so quickly. Two things have happened since. On June 14th, Brackman had his best start of the season – striking out 11 without a walk in 6 innings. And on June 10th, Mark Newman made the following comment:

SJK: Moving on to individual players and a lightening rod in the fanbase, let’s talk about Andrew Brackman. His control is remarkably better this year. His strikeout-to-walk ratio is almost 6. But, I also read reports earlier in the year that his velocity was down and his secondary pitches still needed significant work. Where does he stand right now with you?

Mark Newman: He was at 95 the other night. His secondary pitches have improved significantly. He’s made some great progress. There might be some Double-A in his future this year if he continues to perform well. This is the ‘second-year after elbow surgery’ case right here.

K/BB and velocity are the two gold standards of prospect evaluation. By both measures, Brackman appears to be a completely different type of pitcher from last season. He spent much of 2009 pitching in the high-90s, but sported some of the worst control in organized baseball. He walked 76 batters with 10 hit batters and 26 wild pitches in just 106 2/3 innings. In 2010, he’s sported a Hector Noesi-like K/BB ratio (51/7 in 55 innings) while operating at lower velocity. The news couldn’t be more encouraging, and I’m betting that at the end of the season I will be reranking Brackman higher than where he currently is at.

Andrew Brackman’s reduced velocity concerned me quite a bit at the beginning of the season. He book on Brackman was that he had a sky-high ceiling because he could throw 100 mph with a good curveball on his 6’10″ plane. In his pre-injury college high period, Brackman sported great control, and was hailed as a much better athlete than other giant MLB pitchers like Randy Johnson. A lower velocity meant a lower ceiling, especially with his declining control. He looked more like Andrew Sisco than Randy Johnson.

Of course, Brackman was just coming off Tommy John surgery. Brackman had put off his elbow surgery despite an obvious injury for a full year going into the 2007 draft. We’re probably looking at his first truly healthy performance since 2006.

We don’t have A-ball pitch counts, but I’m very curious as to whether or not Andrew Brackman is on a pitch count. He has yet to throw more than 6 innings in a game, despite a WHIP of 1.255 and a great K/BB ratio. He appears to be throwing strikes. If not, I’m concerned that Brackman is throwing too many pitches to too many batters, which would suggest that he lacks either the confidence to move off the corners, or the absence of a put away pitch. Either way, its not good news, though not catastrophic. Brackman may be learning to pitch in an environment where he isn’t going to blow away batters with a 100 mph fastball. That’s a big adjustment, and big adjustments take some time.

The biggest problem, however, is that Brackman doesn’t have a lot of time on his side. He signed a major league contract right out of college (a mistake, in hindsight) and was optioned down to the minor leagues the following spring. This means that Brackman used an option year in 2008, 2009, and 2010. Next season will be his finally option year, and the Yankees will be unable to send him down to the minor leagues in the 2012 season without exposing him to waivers. He isn’t going to pass through waivers if he is pitching well at all, which puts a very clear clock on Brackman and the Yankees.

Mark Newman mentioned that Brackman could see Double-A if he continues to pitch well this season. I think that is an absolute necessity if Brackman is going to follow any reasonable development plan to debut in New York with the Yankees. He will need to probably spend at least a little bit of time in the majors, and definitely some quality Triple-A time, for the Yankees to entrust him with a 2012 rotation spot, in 2011. Both are hard to see if he has to wait until the beginning of 2011 to see his first action with the Trenton Thunder.

Any confidence or pitch count issues will hurt Brackman especially hard when he reaches Double-A. More advanced batters will create more advanced issues for him to deal with. I still think its possible that the Yankees have Brackman on an innings or pitch limit, but if he’s not on one there will be a dilemma or Newman and the rest of the Yankee staff. Do they push Brackman in an attempt to put him on a timetable that actually could set him in the major leagues, or do they take their normal development time with him, but risk being forced to trade, waive him, or put him in the bullpen in order to ensure a MLB spot?

I’m in favor of taking a few more risks and pushing Brackman aggressively, because I’m tired of seeing Yankee pitchers starting for the Pittsburgh Pirates. We’ll see.

Jun 172010

Despite some O’Neill Theory action in the ninth inning, there was another very bright spot in last night’s 6-3 loss against the Phillies.

Now, I never thought I’d say this, but Boone Logan was great last night. He pitched 2.2 innings of scoreless ball, striking out three, walking one (IBB), and inducing four grounders and one fly ball.

My favorite part of Logan’s night can be summarized in this chart:

Look at the yellow dots that represent swinging strikes. They’re all in very good locations: down and in to lefties and up at the batter’s eyes. Those locations will likely induce swings and misses–like they did last night–or very weak contact.

Speaking of contact, Logan’s locations on pitches that ended in contact–fouls or in play, outs–aren’t great. They’re in locations that look like they’d get crushed. That didn’t happen against Boone last night. This tells me that the Philadelphia hitters were kept off balance by Logan and when they did get pitches that were in hittable locations, they didn’t do much with them.

Now, this outing could be a double edged sword. It’s great that Logan did as well as he did to keep the Yankees in the game, but this performance did come in a low leverage situation. To be a little sarcastic/half kidding but not really, this good performance worries me a bit. It worries me because it will encourage Joe Girardi to use Logan more. Last night’s performance not withstanding, more Boone Logan is not really a good thing. But, honestly, let’s just take it when we get it.

© 2011 TYU Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha