IMPORTANT BLOG ANNOUNCEMENT

PLEASE CHANGE YOUR BOOKMARKS AND FEEDS TO THE NEW URL, YANKEEANALYSTS.COM. TYU IS IN NO WAY AFFILIATED WITH THE NEW YORK YANKEES OR YANKEES UNIVERSE.

With last night’s rainout and today’s doubleheader, the Yankees are now a starter short for Sunday’s contest with the Twins, as slated starter Javier Vazquez just lost a day of rest due to the rescheduling. Jscape2000 over at Pinstripe Alley presents the options:

Option 1: Short rest

They could ask Javy to pitch on 3 days rest Sunday in Minnesota. This would set up Hughes, Sabathia, Burnett, Pettitte for next week’s two game sets with the Red Sox and Rays. This also lines up Javy to pitch the first game at CitiField, which Joe G has said he wants.

Option 2: Full rotation

Assume Vazquez pitches well today. They could use a spot starter on Sunday against the Twins, and then give either Hughes (who is on an innings limit) of Javy an extra day of rest.

Option 3: Skip a start

If things go badly, the Yanks could opt to use a spot starter on Sunday, and then simply skip Javy in the rotation again. This puts the aces on the field for the Red Sox and Rays series. Or if things go well, the Yanks may simply use the opportunity to give Hughes a breather and to re-align the rotation.

I would go with option #2. It is way too early to ask any pitcher to throw on 3 days rest, and none of these upcoming games are important enough to justify skipping Vazquez again just to properly line up the rotation for the Sox and Rays. The Yankees should simply use a spot starter on Sunday, and then let Vazquez get a shot against Boston. Skipping him against the Red Sox again will simply tell Javy that they do not believe in him at all, a dangerous message to send a player who has to be doubting himself at this point.

As for who should get the spot start, I think Ivan Nova actually makes the most sense for that slot. With Alfredo Aceves out, the Yankees are missing their regular long man, and Sergio Mitre seemed to be settling into that role over the season’s first month. The difference in expected performance between Nova and Mitre is not drastic, such that the Yankees can give Nova a shot and reward him for his strong performance and drastic improvement over the last 14 months. Furthermore, a good performance could establish him as a solid trade chip should they need to make an in-season move.

What do you think the Yankees should do?

May 122010

J-Doug at Rational Pastime recently noticed that Mariano Rivera’s velocity has been slightly down this April compared to last. He wondered why it was not impacting Mo’s performance, and found two primary explanations (I recommend clicking through to the article to see some nifty velocity and break charts):

Even when Rivera’s cut fastball was coming up short through 8 starts, it certainly wasn’t affecting overall outcomes—Mariano has yet to allow a run this year. Compare this to April 2009 when he had already blown two saves. So why is Mariano still able to compete without the zip on his cutter? Two reasons: break, and luck. While the cut fastball’s velocity is dipping, Mo has added to the already maddening break of his cutter. As you can see in the graph (below), Cut Fastball v.2010 is breaking a full inch more than the 2009 version….

That said, I’m not so sure we can give all the credit to Mo in this case. First off, the strike rate on his cut fastball is down, indicating that the pitch is fundamentally less effective. Second, Rivera’s opponents are only hitting 0.155 against him when they get the ball in play. That’s a full 0.120 below his career average, and 0.230 below where he was this time last year.

I would suggest that the reduced strike rate is probably related to the added break, in that it is more difficult for Mo to be his typically precise self when his cutter is breaking more than usual. As for the overall change in Mariano’s stuff, it is hard to determine what this might mean. His slightly reduced velocity could be a product of his injury, although it is possible that it is simply part of a typical aging process. Mo may be compensating for the loss of velocity by intentionally adding break to the cutter, trying to keep hitters who have more time to adjust to his pitches off balance. I would suspect that as the season continues, his luck will normalize, his velocity will increase, and his strike percentage will stabilize, adding up to more domination from the Yankees ageless closer. I’ll certainly be keeping an eye on the velocity and break on his cutter.

Later today, the Yankees will square off in a day/night double header.

In game one, Javier Vazquez will oppose Rick Porcello and in game two, Phil Hughes will face Jeremy Bonderman. Let’s examine how the Yanks’ opponents have done so far and see what the Yankees can do to counter Bondo and Porcello.

We’ll start with the guy whose pitches will start the day: Rick Porcello. After a solid rookie season in 2009, Porcello has struggled. He hasn’t allowed fewer than five runs since his second start of the season and has not pitched more than six innings in any of his starts. His ERA is an ugly 7.50, though his FIP is a more respectable 4.41 and his xFIP is at 4.61, so a correction could be coming. His tRA is 3.89 and his tRA+ is 114 so he’s not giving up hard contact. Hopefully, Rick’s recovery doesn’t start tomorrow.

His pitch selection is led by a two seam fastball that he throws 55.5% of the time and averages 89.7 MPH. Next at 21.1% is a four seam fastball that sits at 91.6. He has a slider that goes 81.4 MPH and has gotten swings and misses on 15% of its offerings. However, FanGraphs has that pitch at 4.42 runs below average per 100 pitches. Wrapping it up is a changeup that’s been thrown 11.1% of the time and travels at 80.5 MPH, a good difference from the fastball. Texas Leaguers has also identified a curveball thrown 0.8% of the time. Those pitches are likely mislabeled sliders.

Starting out a plate appearance, Porcello will likely throw some sort of fastball. He’s started batters with a two or four seamer 76.1% of the time. When getting ahead 0-1 or 0-2, Porcello, like most, likes to use his changeup and slider more. When behind 1-0, Porcello stays with the two seamer (63%), but also increases his changeup use (15%). When down 2-0, Porcello has thrown only fastballs.

So, how should the Yankees approach Porcello? As always, they should be patient. Jumping out at pitches won’t help any offense. However, if they get ahead 2-0, they should be looking to swing away. It’s almost a guarantee that Porcello’s throwing a fastball in that count and it’s turned into a strike 70% of the time. When they fall behind, wait some more. Porcello’s not a strikeout guy and with the increased offspeed pitches after strike one, it’s likely that the Yankees could wait the PA out into an even or favorable count.

Jeremy Bonderman has a similar repertoire to Porcello (2/4 seamers, slider, changeup). Bonderman goes to his non-fastball stuff much more (38.1%) than Porcello (23.4%). Most of his first pitches are also fastballs. Unlike Porcello, though, when Bonderman gets ahead 0-1, he uses his fastball more (55%) than in all situations (51%). On 0-2, though, Bonderman’s fastball usage plummets to 44% and his slider usage pumps up to 36%. When behind, Bonderman goes back to the comfort of the old number one.

Bonderman doesn’t throw hard (89.9 MPH average) and his change up is only 5.2 MPH slower than the fastball. This is a good thing for the Yankees. They likely won’t be overpowered and if they can spit on the slider, they can hammer the relatively slow fastball. This is easy for me to say, blogging from my bedroom, but the Yankees are definitely good enough to force Bonderman to throw his fastball. If they can do that, it’ll be a long day for Jeremy.

© 2011 TYU Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha