IMPORTANT BLOG ANNOUNCEMENT

PLEASE CHANGE YOUR BOOKMARKS AND FEEDS TO THE NEW URL, YANKEEANALYSTS.COM. TYU IS IN NO WAY AFFILIATED WITH THE NEW YORK YANKEES OR YANKEES UNIVERSE.

The following table is a breakdown of the 2009 Yankees’ collective numbers for their starting pitching staff with regards to overall pitch selection and pitch effectiveness. The numbers are then ranked in relation to the rest of the American League. All data – pitch type and pitch type value – was provided by FanGraphs.

Fastball — The Yankees have a staff of guys who throw the fastball hard – 2nd in the AL – and, therefore, in 2009, they chose to throw the fastball frequently (4th in the AL). However, Joba Chamberlain (-21.0), Chien-Ming Wang (-16.5), and A.J. Burnett (-13.0) really hurt the team’s collective fastball effectiveness, as their offerings were well below average. In fact, of the Yankees’ staff of starting pitchers, only CC Sabathia posted a positive number (13.6 runs above average).

Best — CC Sabathia (+13.6)
Worst — Joba Chamberlain (-21.0)

Changeup — The Yankees didn’t throw the changeup much this past season – 12th in the AL – however, when they did, the average velocity was 84.5 mph – 1st in the AL – and it proved to be an effective pitch for them (2nd in the AL). Still, the positive rating/ranking was mainly the result of Sabathia, who had the most effective changeup in the AL (+22.5) and the second most effective changeup in baseball behind Tim Lincecum (+35.0). Outside of that, none of Sabathia’s rotation-mates had a very impressive change.

Best — CC Sabathia (+22.5)
Worst — Andy Pettitte (-4.4)

Curveball — Like the fastball, the Yankees utilized the curveball fairly frequently – 4th in the AL – and the team’s average velocity (79.5 mph) with the offering was tops in the AL. The pitch proved to be a dangerous weapon for the Yankee staff – 18.7 runs above average – as the team was first in the league with regards to curveball effectiveness. This was primarily due to A.J. Burnett’s curve (+15.4), although Andy Pettitte’s bender was also notably above average (+4.4).

Best — A.J. Burnett (+15.4)
Worst — Phil Hughes (-1.7)

Splitter — Not much to write for the split-finger fastball. Chien-Ming Wang, according to FanGraphs’ data, was the only starter to employ the pitch and it accounted for only 4.0% of his pitch selection (0.2% of the staff’s overall selection). The splitter, which he threw relatively hard – 84.3 mph, 4th in the AL – was an average offering for Wang in terms of its effectiveness (-0.1) and it was fairly average, league-wise, as the team’s splitter effectiveness (i.e., Wang’s splitter effectiveness) ranked 6th in the AL .

Best — Chien-Ming Wang (-0.1)
Worst — na

Cutter — Collectively, the Yankees didn’t use the cutter as often as other teams – 7th in the AL – and the pitches’ average velocity of 85.0 mph was pretty low – 11th in the AL – however, the cutter was still extremely effective for the team, as they ranked 3rd in the league in that regard (+14.9). Though the pitch was well above average for them, the Yankees’ ranking was mainly based on Andy Pettitte’s season, for his cutter was 15.5 runs above average (and he threw it the most). No one else had a positive cutter rating as a starter.

Best — Andy Pettitte (+15.5)
Worst — Alfredo Aceves (-0.4)

Slider — Even with the addition of CC Sabathia, who is known for his slider, the team’s use of the slider was surprisingly below average. They didn’t throw it much – 11th in the AL – and when they did, the velocity was fairly low (11th in the AL). Everyone on the staff threw a slider outside of Aceves and Hughes, though no slider, in particular, was as effective as Sabathia’s changeup, Burnett’s curveball, or Andy Pettitte’s cutter. They were all decidedly average, including Sabathia’s, which was worth only 1.1 runs above average after being 33.9 runs above average in 2008. Joba Chamberlain’s slider was the best on the staff at 7.5 runs above average. Therefore, though the team’s collective use of the pitch was below average, no one had a terrible slider (other teams were just more effective in their use of the pitch).

Best — Joba Chamberlain (+7.5)
Worst — Sergio Mitre (-0.1)

Any thoughts on the numbers?

Jan 152010

From Mark Bowman (MLB.com):

There’s no doubt that Damon could benefit the Braves from an offensive perspective. But unless he’s willing to essentially play for free, there’s seemingly little reason to believe he’ll be prolonging his career in Atlanta this year.

From what I can gather, the Braves would become players in the Damon sweepstakes if his price drops to somewhere in the neighborhood of $1-2 million.

In other words, it’s not going to happen. Or as one Major League source said, “it would take a miracle” for (the Braves) to sign Damon.

If Atlanta isn’t really in on Damon, market-wise, he has nothing.

Photo by Getty Images


He is, according to David Schoenfield of ESPN.com. He argues that if you consider all facets of the game and weigh longevity heavily, Jeter edges out players such as Cal Ripken, Arky Vaughan, and Barry Larkin, with only Honus Wagner finishing ahead of Jeter. A few months ago, I tackled this issue by looking simply at offense, and this is what I found:

Honus Wagner:
Career Numbers: .327/.391/.466 OPS+: 150
5 best (full) years by OPS+: 205, 187, 186, 176, 175

Joe Cronin:
Career Numbers: .301/.390/.468 OPS+: 119
5 best years by OPS+: 138, 136, 135, 129, 127

Arky Vaughan:
Career Numbers: .318/.406/.453 OPS+: 136
5 best years by OPS+: 190, 149, 148, 146, 140

Lou Boudreau:
Career Numbers: .295/.380/.415 OPS+: 120
5 best years by OPS+: 164, 145, 133, 131, 128

Cal Ripken:
Career Numbers: .276/.340/.447 OPS+: 112
5 best years by OPS+: 162, 145, 144, 143, 128

Derek Jeter:
Career Numbers: .317/.387/.459 OPS+: 121
5 best years by OPS+: 153, 132, 128, 127, 126

One note: Looking at 5 best seasons by OPS+ does not exactly do Jeter justice, as much of his value is caught up in his consistency. His 6-10 best years are likely better than those years for most of the players on this list. That being said, I think we can reach a few conclusions.

1) Honus Wagner is the best hitting SS of all time, and Arky Vaughan is second.

2) Cal Ripken stuck around way too long, and his decline was substantial enough to knock him out of the top 5 in terms of offensive value.

3) Jeter is right there in the next group with Boudreau and Cronin, rounding out the top 5, and an argument can be made for Jeter as #3 if you place career value over peak.

Conclusion: Among players who remained at SS for the bulk of their careers, Derek Jeter is no higher than 3rd but is likely no lower than 5th (unless I missed somebody) in terms of hitting. Next time somebody tells you he would be a borderline star if he played in KC, tell him to do some research.

I placed Jeter third offensively, but this did not take longevity into account, and focused more upon peak than career value. Schoenfield argues convincingly that Jeter should be ahead of Vaughan, due to Vaughan only having 11 full seasons at SS, and Jeter likely to end up with 18 or so. However, when defense enters the equation, I think Jeter loses some value, such that he is likely to be neck and neck with Ripken by the end of his career. For now, I would have Jeter 4th, behind Wagner, Ripken, and Vaughan, with the chance to move up to 2nd.

Where would you place Jeter?

Curtis Granderson

In the second part of my “Middle Ground” series, I’ll be examining the projections for new centerfielder Curtis Granderson. Last year was a down year (I use the term loosely) of sorts for Granderson. Though he hit 30 homers, his OPS as under .800 for the first time since 2006 and his batting average dropped to a career low .249. He still had 72 walks, though, and his IsoP was just over .200. Basically, 2009 was a mixed bag. With a new team and a new stadium in 2010, Granderson could improve. Let’s see what CHONE, Marcel, Bill James, and the fans have to say about Curtis.

By averaging out the numbers, I got the following projection for Granderson for 2010:

.272/.350/.491/.841 with 27 homers, 78 RBI, 67 BB, 133 SO, 17 SB, 5 CS in 657 PA. That would be the best performance the Yankees have gotten from a CF since Bernie Williams was a part of the team. Granderson also plays–at the very least–good defense and with his bat, could be a very valuable player. If he stays in CF all season, it’s quite likely that Granderson could be at least a three-win player, and he could also make a push to be a four-win player, if he outperforms his projection a bit, which is possible.

Granderson is going from an average lineup to one of the best in all of baseball and that could help him hit at an even higher level than what I’m projecting here. In the five spot, he’ll have a lot of guys on base in front of him, and there’s a good chance that those guys will be in scoring position.

Moving parks will also help Curtis. While YSIII isn’t exactly the hitter’s haven the MSM makes it out to be, it is very friendly to lefty power hitters and it could boost Curtis’s home run rate. Obviously, the more homers Curtis hits, the better he will be.

While Granderson’s projected 133 strikeouts seem like a lot, he’s also projecting to walk a good amount of times too–67. All four systems, and mine, project Curtis to have a higher BB/K (anywhere from .49-.53) than his career rate (.44) and his walk rate will likely stay in double digits.

As I said with Brett Gardner last night, if Granderson can put up what is his “average” projection, I’ll be absolutely thrilled. While I wasn’t too hot on a trade for Curtis before it actually happened–however, that deal was just way too great to be angry at–I’m very excited to see Curtis suit up for the Bombers this year. Both his bat and his defense should be a welcome sight in centerfield after years of average or below average play there.

Jan 152010

I apologize for being absent for the last couple of weeks. A family accident (side note, my father is actually having Tommy John surgery) and a new job ate up a lot of my time. But I’m back.

SB Nation is doing a very cool series of posts detailing what issues the various sports leagues will have to confront over the next decade. While they have not yet covered baseball, Mike Fischer of of In Lou We Trust has a great post about the challenges that the New Jersey Devils will face over the next 10 years.

We’ll remember the 1990s for the dynasty, the exciting, highly respected players, and for the reemergence of a dominant Yankee team. We’ll probably in the end remember the 2000s for playoff failures more than anything. 2009 felt like the beginning of something new, and ended in the best possible way. But over the next ten years, what are the big picture challenges that the Yankees will face? I’ve got four.

#1 CBA Negotiations, Salary Caps, and Populist Backlash

The Yankees began really dramatically spending following the 2003 season. While they had the biggest payroll in baseball before that, they began dwarfing even the Red Sox and Angels starting in 2004. Since then, other teams have spent quite a bit more money, but the Yankees are still the only team paying the luxury tax.

From 2004 until today, there hasn’t been very much real backlash against the Yankees. Every once in awhile, John Henry would talk about the need for a salary cap, or Jeff Loria would pretend that he doesn’t have the money to compete, but not a lot was said on the issue. However, that was all happening while the Yankees weren’t winning World Series. I suspect that if the team pulls off a 2010 or 2011 (or both) victory, we’ll start to hear much heavier chatter about a much stronger salary cap or luxury tax.

And honestly, that chatter is probably right. Yes, the Yankees are great for baseball, have spent a lot of money to get where they are, and mostly get past the point of diminishing returns in the free agent markets (see 82 million for A.J. Burnett). But the Yankees are on a budget right now, and making a ton of money. If the Steinbrenners relaxed that budget just a bit, the team could probably spent 250 million on payroll without losing money; maybe more. Going forward their revenue stands only to grow significantly, so the payroll would probably get bigger. If the Yankees are finally spending their money wisely (more on that later), they are at a major competitive advantage. This isn’t 1950: baseball can’t take one team dominating the league permanently. I think the eventual result will be a “soft cap” – basically a stronger luxury tax.

The Yankees will need to adjust to this new climate. At what point will a cap kick in? Will they be able to function without a huge monetary advantage over their opponents? If Brian Cashman has the same resources as Theo Epstein, can be be smarter? These are huge questions to answer.

#2 Letting the 1990s go

Derek Jeter, Andy Pettitte, Jorge Posada, and Mariano Rivera have a truly outstanding place in Yankee history carved out for them. All deserve to have their numbers retired, and all but Andy deserve enshrinement in Cooperstown. While they are all still performing at a high level, the day that they start to decline will be a sad one. We already saw a preview of this when Bernie Williams experienced his three or four season long decline.

The Yankees kept playing and bringing back Bernie Williams out of nostalgia. He wasn’t a valuable player for the last three or four years of his deal, but they treated him as one. Most of this was Joe Torre’s typical brand of nepostism, but it was also a team-wide unwillingness to accept that sometimes you have to give up your heroes and let new guys take over. And sometimes that separation isn’t pretty.

An early test of this may come after the 2010 season. Derek Jeter’s contract will be up. He will be about to turn 37 years old, and still playing shortstop. While 2009 was a great defensive year for Jeter, chances are he’ll be playing a pretty bad shortstop going forward. He’ll also want a huge contract despite his advanced age, probably valued at 20 million per year.

I’m sorry, but Derek Jeter age 37 is not a 20 million dollar per year player. Even if he has a shot at a 2009-like fantastic year, he’ll be a tremendous injury risk. He may not even be able to be a shortstop. The Yankees will be challenged to put team-building ahead of nostalgia. How much do they pay him? What position will he play? At what point are they willing to walk away? Mariano Rivera is another tough case, but I think that Derek Jeter’s position is tougher. Jorge Posada should go quietly, and Andy Pettitte seems to be interested in retiring on his own.

#3 Managing the huge contract

In many ways the Yankees are very lucky to have the 90s-four about to be free agents. While still universally very effective, the big four are about to let the Yankees free of enormous financial commmitments. Except for some Jason Giambi moments, the Yankees have mostly avoided large albatross contracts despite their aging lineup. They’ve narrowly dodged a lot of landmines.

The next mine to dodge is a really big one though. Alex Rodriguez is owed 32 million per season for the beginning part of this decade. He will continue to be the highest paid player on the team while he turns 40. His massive deal runs through 2017 – longer than C.C. Sabathia and Mark Teixeira, both of whom are still on the right side of 30.

The Yankees really boxed themselves in to a bad situation here. While they can whether a bad contract, even the Yankees don’t have the financial resources to whether a 32 million dollar albatross without major ramifications. Even though he will be 35 in the first season of the decade, the 2010s Yankees will be defined by their star slugger.

For what its worth, I think that Arod is a reasonably good bet going forward. He’s been mostly hampered by a single reoccuring injury, which seems to have been fixed pretty well. Even while suffering from surgery hangover, Arod was still the best player at his position. He certainly doesn’t look 35 when healthy. And nor should he – Alex Rodriguez is one of the most athletic players in the game. That ages well.

The Big Question

This isn’t a challenge to deal with, but rather a maturing question that the team has to deal with. Can they expect to perpetually contend? Will the Yankees ever have to rebuild? At some point, will expectations have to be reduced?

I think that as long as the current salary cap situation remains stable, the Yankees can and should try to build a team set upon perpetual contention. I think that the path that Brian Cashman and Joe Girardi are on is much different from the late-Torre years. Looking toward perpetual contention requires a long-term plan that is prioritized over short-term decisions. What does this mean?

It means not trading Phil Hughes, Ian Kennedy, and Melky Cabrera for Johan Santana, whose production can be equalled a year later with C.C. Sabathia. This move made the Yankees signicantly weaker in 2008, and may have cost them a playoff spot. However, it paid off in 2009, and with the additions of Javier Vazquez and Curtis Granderson it will eventually pay off over the next few seasons. They sacrificed 2008 for 2009-2013 and beyond.

These kinds of draconian decisions have to be made. Perpetual competition requires a mindset that a George Steinbrenner-led team could never stomach. Luckily, his sons have proven to be all business, and Brian Cashman has shown his genius since George faded into the background. But, as I discussed above, not all decisions are easy. Derek Jeter is not going to get a 20 million dollar deal from any of the 29 other clubs. The Yankees shouldn’t give him one either. They shouldn’t keep Mariano and Posada along a day longer than they are useful to the team, and they shouldn’t plan on holding the “we can always spend 250 million” card for too long. Otherwise, some time before the next decade is over, we fans will end up watching just another ordinary baseball team.

Jan 152010

In a recent piece on MLB.com, Mark Sheldon has a recap of how the Aroldis Chapman sweepstakes went down, with some interesting notes on why the Yanks passed on the 21 year old Cuban fireballer.   He writes:

Once Chapman was declared a free agent by Major League Baseball, speculation was that the 21-year-old’s asking price might make big-market, deep-pocketed clubs favorites to acquire Chapman. But that proved to be a wrong assumption.

Many teams, such as the Red Sox and Yankees, were indicating to Hendricks they viewed Chapman as mostly a luxury. Boston, which had recently signed free agent John Lackey, already had a stocked pitching staff. So did the Yankees. Clubs like these viewed Chapman as part of their big league plans — in 2011 or ’12.

The Reds presented themselves as a younger club that could provide a chance for Chapman to pitch in the Majors in 2010.

“So here’s the metaphor I used when teams expressed concern this would be for just the highest bidder, like New York or Boston,” Hendricks said. “‘If I had a great first baseman from Cuba, do you think I’d call the St. Louis Cardinals first?’ We wanted opportunity. We would like to put him in a system where he’d have an opportunity to emerge sooner.”

So often we assume these deals will come down only to financial considerations, yet as that last quote clearly shows playing time and hope of cracking the starting rotation was a major consideration as well. While Chapman did go to the highest bidder in terms of total dollars, the money is to be paid out over a term of 10 years, so between inflation and currency devaluation an offer of 23-25 mil from another team could have been worth more. There were reports that the Blue Jays and Angels were in that price range. You can easily speculate how this deal went down. Hendricks probably asked the Reds to match the dollars and term of the Jays/Angels offers, telling them he would prefer to go there. When the Reds balked, the two sides hammered out a long deal that spread out the financial impact on the club.

I don’t disagree at all with either the Red Sox or Yanks assessment of Chapman’s future in respect to each of their teams. The reality is he’d have a very hard time cracking the Red Sox rotation, and an even tougher time cracking the Yankee staff in the coming years. As things stand right now, the Yanks have one spot for two pitchers in Joba Chamberlain and Phil Hughes, both of whom are much further along in terms of development than Chapman is. If either Andy Pettitte retires or Javier Vasquez leaves, you still wouldn’t have room on the 2011 team for Chapman, and that assumes that he’s ready to contribute, which is a big assumption. If he was more willing to work out of the bullpen, then the entire equation changes. But Chapman said from Day 1 that he wanted to start, and given how far off he is I never thought it really added up for the Yankees. I wish him well, and it will still be an exciting day when he makes his first big league start for the Reds.

photo courtesy of the NY Daily News

© 2011 TYU Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha