IMPORTANT BLOG ANNOUNCEMENT

PLEASE CHANGE YOUR BOOKMARKS AND FEEDS TO THE NEW URL, THEYANKEEU.COM. TYU IS IN NO WAY AFFILIATED WITH THE NEW YORK YANKEES OR YANKEES UNIVERSE.
Dec 072009

According to Jorge Arangure (ESPN), “it’s quite possible Aroldis Chapman might not get more than $20 million. Perhaps not even that much.” Arangure’s latest tweet is in congruence with what I said over the weekend, at iYankees, after Noel Arguelles only received $7M from the Royals over 5 years. The Yankees will easily win the bidding for the lefty if this is the case.

Related posts:

  1. Reds sign Chapman for $30M
  2. Buster Olney-Yanks out on Aroldis Chapman
  3. Chapman's new home
  4. Chapman Sweepstakes between Boston and NY
  5. For now, Chapman on hold

6 Responses to “Chapman could sign for less than $20M”

  1. That last sentence doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. If he’s not going to cost over $20 mil to sign, couldn’t the Red Sox easily win the bidding as well?  

    (Quote)

    [Reply To This Comment]

    Chris H. Reply:

    Well, sure, theoretically that could happen. In fact, there are a number of teams that could beat $20M (most baseball teams, could, actually).

    However, as others have noted as of late, the interest in Chapman stops at a certain financial point due to his unknowns. Still, the Yankees are one of the few teams that can risk $20M. Even the Red Sox, with holes in their lineup, may not see that as a worthwhile risk which is why no one is reporting that there will be a huge bidding war for Chapman. If it was known that the Red Sox were willing to go over $20M, then Arangure would not have tweeted this.  

    (Quote)

    [Reply To This Comment]

    The other Chris H Reply:

    At 20-25 million over 5-6 years I think all the risk is completely gone for the Yankees, once you are talking 4 or 5 million a year it’s chump change. You can make that much money and not even be good in this league, if Bruney was set to make 2 million next year then Chapman at 4 or 5 is no big deal at all! If we can get him that cheap you have to sign him just on the chance he is good or even mediocre as a starter.  

    (Quote)

    [Reply To This Comment]

  2. leftylarry says:

    They let 3-4 good draft picks go back to college and I’m assuming it was to save money for this kid. He’s a no-brainer for that money.If he develops quickly and he should, He’s Pettitte’s heir apparent.  

    (Quote)

    [Reply To This Comment]

    Chip Reply:

    He’s not exactly the type who will develop quickly. You’re probably looking at a 3-4 year time frame before he could be fairly decent.  

    (Quote)

    [Reply To This Comment]

    The other Chris H Reply:

    You could see him in the bigs before that… I agree he probably needs at least 2 years in the minor but he could get a taste of the majors by the time he is 24 and that is a good age to come up… Maybe a September call up at 23.  

    (Quote)

    [Reply To This Comment]

Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)