IMPORTANT BLOG ANNOUNCEMENT

PLEASE CHANGE YOUR BOOKMARKS AND FEEDS TO THE NEW URL, YANKEEANALYSTS.COM. TYU IS IN NO WAY AFFILIATED WITH THE NEW YORK YANKEES OR YANKEES UNIVERSE.

. . IF (and that’s a big if) the Yankees land another starter. Brian Cashman was interviewed on the Michael Kay show this afternoon, and cleared up the confusion that was caused by his remarks and the reports that made the rounds soon thereafter.

Kay opened up with a question on this very topic, and I transcribed it word for word, so everyone can read it in its entirety. Though feel free to click the above link for the podcast to listen for yourself, especially since Brian is rather wordy and inflection and emphasis can sometimes alter meaning. Anyway, here goes:

Michael Kay-“So many people were shocked when we played the cut of you yesterday saying that Joba and Phil (Hughes) would be battling for one spot in the rotation. Did you misspeak? Or did you mean that there would be only one spot in the rotation for the two of them?

Brian Cashman-“No! I was very clear, actually. The question that I responded to was ‘If you get another starter, what does that do for Joba and Hughes?’ because all winter long it’s Joba and Hughes are coming in as starters, along with Aceves, Mitre and Gaudin, they’ll be prepared as starters and after that, we’ll see where we go. And essentially, the follow up question was ‘You say you’re looking for starting pitching because you can’t have enough’ and what happens if you do secure another Starter, via Free Agency or trade? My response to that was well, clearly then the competition goes from those 3-4-5 guys for, along with Nova and McCallister, would go for, instead of those guys competing for two spots, they’re competing for one. And the remaining guys would either go to our bullpen or go to AAA as options. So that’s assuming we ever trade, or acquire another starter. Because obviously we have Sabathia, Burnett and Pettitte right now, and we have the Hughes and Chamberlain’s and Gaudin’s and Mitre’s and Aceves’ and McCallisters and Nova’s competing for those final two spots. If we acquire another starter that population can only compete for one more spot. ”

Michael Kay-“Now, I guess the thing that stunned everybody, and was surprising to me Brian was I mean these guys have always been touted as future starters for the Yankees. So you’d be cool with one of them possibly being in the bullpen next year then?

Brian Cashman-If we went in with a starter that we actually like better, yeah. I have no problem with that, I mean we went into the playoffs with Hughes, Aceves and Chamberlain all in the bullpen. Why? Because we had guys we were giving the ball in the rotation , although it was a truncated rotation, we were giving the ball to guys we felt were more capable at that moment in time. So there’s no change in philosophy, as of right now, those guys are all starters. And if nothing changes, those guys are all starters. The question was ‘Well what if you get a starter?’ well, that means we have four, that means the remaining population competes for the final spot”

So long story short, if we get Ben Sheets then one of these guys winds up in the bullpen. That really shouldn’t surprise anyone, but the fact that everyone around the organization seems to think we need another starter makes this a likely scenario. And if they land an arm, they’ll be looking for one with a high ceiling. There’s not much point in getting another Sergio Mitre, they already have plenty of depth as Brian detailed. What they lack is proven upside from that second group.

One interesting note, notice how Brian gave each starter in rank order for the rotation, from his #1 through his #3 starter and did so chronologically. He then proceeded to list the remaining pitchers in what appears to be a chronological order of rank as well, but put Hughes in front of Chamberlain. May be nothing, or may be a window into who the organization thinks more highly of at this time.

From Mark Feinsand:

Damon has been looking for a three-year deal in the $39 million range, and even though sources say that Scott Boras caved on the third year, the Yankees weren’t willing to give Damon the same $13 million salary he earned in each of the last four years.

I have a feeling that Damon and Boras are going to be doing a lot of “caving” in the next few weeks. I expect Johnny to end up somewhere near the deal Bobby Abreu got from the Angels, for 2 years and 19 million. At that price, I think it might be prudent for the Yankees to bring him back, but I am not sure if they would be willing now that Nick Johnson is in the fold. Damon could play LF this season and shift to DH next year. However, considering that Brian Cashman has recently fawned over the talent available on next year’s free agent market, he may just be content to bring in players like Johnson and Sheets on one year deals, and save the money for 2011.

Back in pinstripes again

Many fans have expressed their displeasure over the Yanks decision to go with Nick Johnson and cut ties with Johnny Damon and Hideki Matsui in recent days. Jason Rosenberg over at IATMS goes point by point expressing the reasons he doesn’t like the deal, so I thought it was a good opportunity to answer each one of his concerns directly.

Here’s his thoughts with my replies:

1-I thought that Cashman wanted a player who is capable of playing the OF to man the DH spot. Otherwise, just sign Matsui.  Like the Angels smartly did.

Answer-Matsui can’t play the OF. The Yanks tried to work him out there over and over again for the past few seasons and every time they did, his knee blew up. Nick Johnson can at least play 1 defensive position, Matsui can play zero.


2-Did Cashman panic when Matsui signed?

Answer-No, I’m sure Brian had a Plan A (Damon) Plan B (Matsui) and Plan C (Johnson). He simply reached his Plan C when Hideki signed and he saw Damon’s contract expectations were unreasonable in his view.

3-Heck, why not look at Vlad Guerrero?  Xavier Nady?  Nady would have been a nice DH and possible platoon for Grandy if his lefty woes got worse, not better. And possibly cheaper than Nick.

Answer-Guerrero is physically spent and Nady is coming off (his 2nd) Tommy John surgery. Nick Johnson’s a far better option than Guerrero or Nady.

4-Is this Cashman just trying to exert his will upon Damon and prove to all that he’s not going to be pushed over only because he has the biggest wallet?

Answer-Lets not make this personal, it’s a business decision.

5-If we’re to believe the contract terms, wouldn’t it have made infinitely more sense to re-sign Matsui? The difference is reportedly “only” $1M. Mice nuts to the Yanks.

Answer-You have to establish that one player is far better at this point of their career for the 1mm difference to make “ infinitely more sense“. That hasn’t happened, and I could credibly argue that the opposite is true.

6-Matsui’s proven.

Answer-Jason’s reference is to a small sample size in the World Series, but over the course of his 7 year Yankee career, Matsui is a .312/.391/.541 (.933 OPS) in the post season in 56 games. So chalk up one for Jason. The stuff about handling the DH role I don’t put much stock in. If anything Johnson’s fielding has declined so much that most teams think he’s better off being a DH at this point in his career.

7-Matsui’s Japanese-related advertising draws pays for his contract twice over, and then some. It’s about the money, right?

Answer-Sorry, but I don’t believe those numbers. Especially coming from a Japanese newspaper where you figure the source was close to Matsui, who was obviously a FA and trying to justify a big contract. Previous estimates had the Yanks earning 2-3 mil per year from Matsui’s deal. To use your term, mice nuts to the Yanks.

8-I wonder what Damon and Boras must be wondering right about now, besides “Oh, #$%^&*“. Aside from claiming there’s a mystery team ready to sign Damon to the same over-the-top contract that Bay’s “reportedly” about to receive.  But Damon is apparently living well on Planet Boras.

Answer-There were reports that Johnny lost a lot of money in some Bank scam when the financial markets crashed, and he was even quoted as saying “I cant withdraw my money” at one point. So I don’t blame him for taking whatever he can get. Its likely his last deal, and he has an (allegedly) ex-stripper wife  to keep in Armani G-strings.

9-I think Boras/Damon overplayed their hand. Though, there might be some goofy GM who thinks Damon is worth 3-4 years at $12-13 million per.

Answer-Damon won’t be the first client Scott Boras steers to a bad team for $, and won’t be the last.

10-Does the lower contractual amount free up more money to sign a guy like Sheets, as I have been lobbying for?

Answer-I think so, everyone from Girardi to Hal to Cash made it clear at the Curtis Granderson press conference that they’re in the market for another starting pitcher. We just have to see if Sheet’s demands are as crazy as Johnny’s were, which so far they are.

BTW-Make sure to check out Jason’s response below, he wanted to put his comments in proper context. 

© 2011 TYU Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha